On 5 June 2014 16:21, Matt Porter <mporter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:01:24AM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: >> Introduce common framework for client/protocol drivers and >> controller drivers of Inter-Processor-Communication (IPC). >> >> Client driver developers should have a look at >> include/linux/mailbox_client.h to understand the part of >> the API exposed to client drivers. >> Similarly controller driver developers should have a look >> at include/linux/mailbox_controller.h >> >> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt | 33 ++ >> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 4 + >> drivers/mailbox/mailbox.c | 487 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/mailbox_client.h | 45 ++ >> include/linux/mailbox_controller.h | 121 +++++ > > Could you please include all the DT maintainers here? It's a generic > binding that needs wider review and an ack. The binding should be > separated as noted below. > > From Documentations/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt: > > I. For patch submitters > > 0) Normal patch submission rules from Documentation/SubmittingPatches > applies. > > 1) The Documentation/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch. > > 2) Submit the entire series to the devicetree mailinglist at > > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Thanks. I missed CC'ing DT ML. I remember patches with DT bindings and parser code getting upstream... and actually see better sense in that. But I guess I have to separate out the bindings. Thanks Jassi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
