Nishanth, Tero, On 06/08/20 1:18 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Marc, > This is continuation of the RFC patches[0] regarding the driver > updates to support for following interrupt parent connection: > - INTR -> INTR > - INTA -> GICv3 > The current existing driver assumes that INTR is always connected to > GICv3 and INTA is always connected to INTR. > > As discussed this change breaks the DT backward compatibility but it > allows to not depend on TISCI firmware properties in DT node. IMHO, this > will ensure that any future changes will not effect DT properties. > > This series depends on the the new Yaml bindings for common TISCI[1]. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20190923042405.26064-1-lokeshvutla@xxxxxx/ > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11676843/ > > Tested with: (There is a build error on Today's master while building dtbs. So I enabled > only the TI specific components for building DTBS). > - DT_SCHEMA_FILES="Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,sci-intr.yaml" > v8make dt_binding_check > - DT_SCHEMA_FILES="Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,sci-inta.yaml" > v8make dt_binding_check > - DT_SCHEMA_FILES="Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,sci-intr.yaml" > v8make dtbs_check > - DT_SCHEMA_FILES="Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/ti,sci-inta.yaml" > v8make dtbs_check > - v8make allmodconfig > > Changes since v5: > - Rebased on latest master. > - Collected Reviewed-by from Rob. > - Included DT changes in the same series so that everything can be merged in a single go. > Without DT changes, there are regressions for DMA and other consumer peripherals so suggestion > is to merge everthing in a single go. DT changes apply cleanly on next and Linus's master > without any merge conflicts. Can you Ack the DT patches? Thanks and regards, Lokesh
