On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 13:09:54 +0100, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Currently the I2C framework insists on devices supplying an I2C ID > table. Many of the devices which do so unnecessarily adding quite a > few wasted lines to kernel code. This patch allows drivers a means > to 'not' supply the aforementioned table and match on either DT > and/or ACPI match tables instead. > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> Looks okay to me. I've not applied or tested in any way though. Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c > index e8c2cba..71970da 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int i2c_device_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv) > > > /* Attempt an OF style match */ > - if (of_driver_match_device(dev, drv)) > + if (i2c_of_match_device(drv->of_match_table, dev)) > return 1; > > /* Then ACPI style match */ > @@ -268,7 +268,18 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev) > return 0; > > driver = to_i2c_driver(dev->driver); > - if (!driver->probe || !driver->id_table) > + if (!driver->probe) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + /* > + * An I2C ID table is not mandatory, if and only if, a suitable Device > + * Tree and/or ACPI match table entry is supplied for the probing > + * device. > + * > + * TODO: Provide 'device type' to 'ACPI node' call and match here. > + */ > + if (!driver->id_table && > + !i2c_of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev)) > return -ENODEV; > > if (!device_can_wakeup(&client->dev)) > -- > 1.8.3.2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
