On Mon 2020-08-03 19:42:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 5:51 PM Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > IBM created an implementation of the PCA9552 on a PIC16F > > microcontroller. The I2C device addresses are different from the > > hardware PCA9552, so add a new compatible string and associated > > platform data to be able to probe this device. > > ... > > > pca9550, > > pca9551, > > pca9552, > > + ibm_pca9552, > > pca9553, > > I would rather not mix like this, but use alpha order, for example. > It's better to read and see which devices are supported by vendor. Actually I see no huge reason to change that. pca9552 and ibm_pca9552 should be very similar, so it makes sense to keep them close together. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
