.
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 at 06:06, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 6:13 AM Ezequiel Garcia
> <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > I'm slowly making progress on the series. Here's some more comments.
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 03:10, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Support the new extended firmware used by MT8183's encoder.
> > >
> >
> > If you could add some more information about the MT8183 encoder
> > and the extended firmware interface, it would make the review
> > easier.
>
> Sure, I'll try to expand that description a bit.
>
> >
> > Some comments below, I have no idea how this hardware
> > works, so maybe I won't make sense :-)
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > [acourbot: refactor, cleanup and split]
> > > Co-developed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Acked-by: Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h | 12 +++
> > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c | 34 ++++---
> > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c | 65 +++++++++++--
> > > .../platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_vp8_if.c | 3 +-
> > > .../media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_drv_if.h | 6 ++
> > > .../media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_ipi_msg.h | 15 ++-
> > > .../media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c | 97 +++++++++++++------
> > > .../media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.h | 3 +-
> > > 8 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
> > > index e132c4ec463a..45c8adfc6a0c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_drv.h
> > > @@ -300,6 +300,17 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_ctx {
> > >
> > > };
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata - compatible data for each IC
> > > + *
> > > + * @uses_ext: whether the encoder uses the extended firmware messaging format
> > > + * @has_lt_irq: whether the encoder uses the LT irq
> > > + */
> > > +struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata {
> > > + bool uses_ext;
> > > + bool has_lt_irq;
> >
> > Instead of this boolean here, I think it might be cleaner
> > to have a small array of strings, listing the interrupts
> > each variant requires.
> >
> > See drivers/staging/media/hantro/rk3288_vpu_hw.c
> >
> > It's future-proof and even if you don't plan to see
> > future works: a) we never know and b) cleaner code,
> > easier to maintain.
>
> I tend to agree. Note however that this boolean is supposed to
> disappear soon as there is another patch (not part of this series)
> that will split the decoder into two nodes. The reason why we have
> this boolean is because MT8173 actually controls *2* instances of this
> encoder (one for H.264, one for VP8) that are actually separate
> hardware.
>
Well, if you are planning to get rid of this boolean,
then ignore the comment.
> MT8183 only has one instance of the encoder (for H.264, that chip has
> no VP8 support), so I have added this boolean to control this. Once
> the DT node split happens it will go away.
Will this DT change break compatibility?
> In the meantime, maybe we
> can try to handle this better by looking at the number of interrupts
> provided by the DT and enabling/disabling that extra interrupt based
> on that. It will be 2 for MT8173 and 1 for MT8183, so that should work
> fine.
>
> >
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * struct mtk_vcodec_dev - driver data
> > > * @v4l2_dev: V4L2 device to register video devices for.
> > > @@ -348,6 +359,7 @@ struct mtk_vcodec_dev {
> > > spinlock_t irqlock;
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *curr_ctx;
> > > void __iomem *reg_base[NUM_MAX_VCODEC_REG_BASE];
> > > + const struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata *venc_pdata;
> > >
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_fw *fw_handler;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c
> > > index 42530cd01a30..922bc8883811 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/mtk_vcodec_enc_drv.c
> > > @@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > if (IS_ERR(dev->fw_handler))
> > > return PTR_ERR(dev->fw_handler);
> > >
> > > + dev->venc_pdata = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > > ret = mtk_vcodec_init_enc_pm(dev);
> > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get mt vcodec clock source!");
> > > @@ -278,21 +279,24 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > ret = -EINVAL;
> > > goto err_res;
> > > }
> > > + disable_irq(dev->enc_irq);
> > >
> >
> > I am aware this is not an issue with this patch:
> > requesting an interrupt and then immediately
> > disabling the interrupt looks racy.
> >
> > Now, I haven't need this pattern myself,
> > but from a quick grep I think you want to do:
> >
> > irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> > ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, ...
> >
> > Perhaps something to fix (probably in another patch,
> > before this one).
>
> Nice suggestion, thanks. I will test and add a patch to this series.
>
> >
> > > - dev->enc_lt_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > > - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
> > > - dev->enc_lt_irq, mtk_vcodec_enc_lt_irq_handler,
> > > - 0, pdev->name, dev);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > > - "Failed to install dev->enc_lt_irq %d (%d)",
> > > - dev->enc_lt_irq, ret);
> > > - ret = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto err_res;
> > > + if (dev->venc_pdata->has_lt_irq) {
> > > + dev->enc_lt_irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 1);
> > > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev,
> > > + dev->enc_lt_irq,
> > > + mtk_vcodec_enc_lt_irq_handler,
> > > + 0, pdev->name, dev);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > > + "Failed to install dev->enc_lt_irq %d (%d)",
> > > + dev->enc_lt_irq, ret);
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + goto err_res;
> > > + }
> > > + disable_irq(dev->enc_lt_irq); /* VENC_LT */
> > > }
> > >
> > > - disable_irq(dev->enc_irq);
> > > - disable_irq(dev->enc_lt_irq); /* VENC_LT */
> > > mutex_init(&dev->enc_mutex);
> > > mutex_init(&dev->dev_mutex);
> > > spin_lock_init(&dev->irqlock);
> > > @@ -373,8 +377,12 @@ static int mtk_vcodec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static const struct mtk_vcodec_enc_pdata mt8173_pdata = {
> > > + .has_lt_irq = true,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > static const struct of_device_id mtk_vcodec_enc_match[] = {
> > > - {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-enc",},
> > > + {.compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-vcodec-enc", .data = &mt8173_pdata},
> > > {},
> > > };
> > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_vcodec_enc_match);
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> > > index 7a00f050ec36..050787b2896c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
> > > @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ static const char h264_filler_marker[] = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x1, 0xc};
> > > #define H264_FILLER_MARKER_SIZE ARRAY_SIZE(h264_filler_marker)
> > > #define VENC_PIC_BITSTREAM_BYTE_CNT 0x0098
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * enum venc_h264_frame_type - h264 encoder output bitstream frame type
> > > + */
> > > +enum venc_h264_frame_type {
> > > + VENC_H264_IDR_FRM,
> > > + VENC_H264_I_FRM,
> > > + VENC_H264_P_FRM,
> > > + VENC_H264_B_FRM,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * enum venc_h264_vpu_work_buf - h264 encoder buffer index
> > > */
> > > @@ -137,7 +147,8 @@ struct venc_h264_inst {
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_mem work_bufs[VENC_H264_VPU_WORK_BUF_MAX];
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_mem pps_buf;
> > > bool work_buf_allocated;
> > > - unsigned int frm_cnt;
> > > + u32 frm_cnt; /* declared as u32 to properly overflow */
> >
> > This looks like it's fixing some issue not related to the 8183
> > or the extended firmware. Perhaps you can add a
> > more details comment?
>
> Mmm, let me check that a bit closer because I know MT8183 communicates
> with the firmware a bit differently, so this may require these fields.
> But maybe we can split that part into another patch.
>
> >
> > > + unsigned int skip_frm_cnt;
> > > unsigned int prepend_hdr;
> > > struct venc_vpu_inst vpu_inst;
> > > struct venc_h264_vsi *vsi;
> > > @@ -327,6 +338,22 @@ static unsigned int h264_enc_wait_venc_done(struct venc_h264_inst *inst)
> > > return irq_status;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int h264_frame_type(struct venc_h264_inst *inst)
> > > +{
> > > + if ((inst->vsi->config.gop_size != 0 &&
> > > + (inst->frm_cnt % inst->vsi->config.gop_size) == 0) ||
> > > + (inst->frm_cnt == 0 && inst->vsi->config.gop_size == 0)) {
> > > + /* IDR frame */
> > > + return VENC_H264_IDR_FRM;
> > > + } else if ((inst->vsi->config.intra_period != 0 &&
> > > + (inst->frm_cnt % inst->vsi->config.intra_period) == 0) ||
> > > + (inst->frm_cnt == 0 && inst->vsi->config.intra_period == 0)) {
> > > + /* I frame */
> > > + return VENC_H264_I_FRM;
> > > + } else {
> > > + return VENC_H264_P_FRM; /* Note: B frames are not supported */
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > static int h264_encode_sps(struct venc_h264_inst *inst,
> > > struct mtk_vcodec_mem *bs_buf,
> > > unsigned int *bs_size)
> > > @@ -337,7 +364,7 @@ static int h264_encode_sps(struct venc_h264_inst *inst,
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug_enter(inst);
> > >
> > > ret = vpu_enc_encode(&inst->vpu_inst, H264_BS_MODE_SPS, NULL,
> > > - bs_buf, bs_size);
> > > + bs_buf, bs_size, NULL);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -364,7 +391,7 @@ static int h264_encode_pps(struct venc_h264_inst *inst,
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug_enter(inst);
> > >
> > > ret = vpu_enc_encode(&inst->vpu_inst, H264_BS_MODE_PPS, NULL,
> > > - bs_buf, bs_size);
> > > + bs_buf, bs_size, NULL);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > @@ -410,13 +437,24 @@ static int h264_encode_frame(struct venc_h264_inst *inst,
> > > {
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > unsigned int irq_status;
> > > + struct venc_frame_info frame_info;
> > >
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug_enter(inst);
> > > -
> > > + /* Overflowing back to 0 is ok and expected here */
> > > + inst->frm_cnt++;
> > > + mtk_vcodec_debug(inst, "frm_cnt++ = %d\n ", inst->frm_cnt);
> > > + frame_info.frm_cnt = inst->frm_cnt;
> > > + frame_info.skip_frm_cnt = inst->skip_frm_cnt;
> > > + frame_info.frm_type = h264_frame_type(inst);
> >
> > Ditto: Is this chunk related to the new support,
> > or is this addressing some current issue?
>
> I will need to re-read this part to understand which one it is, but
> will split the patch if it turns out to make sense.
>
> >
> > > + mtk_vcodec_debug(inst, "frm_cnt++ = %d,skip_frm_cnt =%d,frm_type=%d.\n",
> > > + frame_info.frm_cnt, frame_info.skip_frm_cnt,
> > > + frame_info.frm_type);
> > > ret = vpu_enc_encode(&inst->vpu_inst, H264_BS_MODE_FRAME, frm_buf,
> > > - bs_buf, bs_size);
> > > - if (ret)
> > > + bs_buf, bs_size, &frame_info);
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + inst->frm_cnt--;
> > > return ret;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * skip frame case: The skip frame buffer is composed by vpu side only,
> > > @@ -427,19 +465,19 @@ static int h264_encode_frame(struct venc_h264_inst *inst,
> > > memcpy(bs_buf->va,
> > > inst->work_bufs[VENC_H264_VPU_WORK_BUF_SKIP_FRAME].va,
> > > *bs_size);
> > > - ++inst->frm_cnt;
> > > + ++inst->skip_frm_cnt;
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > irq_status = h264_enc_wait_venc_done(inst);
> > > if (irq_status != MTK_VENC_IRQ_STATUS_FRM) {
> > > mtk_vcodec_err(inst, "irq_status=%d failed", irq_status);
> > > + inst->frm_cnt--;
> > > return -EIO;
> > > }
> > >
> > > *bs_size = h264_read_reg(inst, VENC_PIC_BITSTREAM_BYTE_CNT);
> > >
> > > - ++inst->frm_cnt;
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug(inst, "frm %d bs_size %d key_frm %d <-",
> > > inst->frm_cnt, *bs_size, inst->vpu_inst.is_key_frm);
> > >
> > > @@ -464,6 +502,7 @@ static void h264_encode_filler(struct venc_h264_inst *inst, void *buf,
> > >
> > > static int h264_enc_init(struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx)
> > > {
> > > + const bool is_ext = ctx->dev->venc_pdata->uses_ext;
> > > int ret = 0;
> > > struct venc_h264_inst *inst;
> > >
> > > @@ -473,8 +512,9 @@ static int h264_enc_init(struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx)
> > >
> > > inst->ctx = ctx;
> > > inst->vpu_inst.ctx = ctx;
> > > - inst->vpu_inst.id = IPI_VENC_H264;
> > > + inst->vpu_inst.id = is_ext ? SCP_IPI_VENC_H264 : IPI_VENC_H264;
> > > inst->hw_base = mtk_vcodec_get_reg_addr(inst->ctx, VENC_SYS);
> > > + inst->frm_cnt = 0xffffffff;
> > >
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug_enter(inst);
> > >
> > > @@ -629,7 +669,12 @@ static int h264_enc_set_param(void *handle,
> > > inst->prepend_hdr = 1;
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug(inst, "set prepend header mode");
> > > break;
> > > -
> > > + case VENC_SET_PARAM_FORCE_INTRA:
> > > + case VENC_SET_PARAM_GOP_SIZE:
> > > + case VENC_SET_PARAM_INTRA_PERIOD:
> > > + inst->frm_cnt = 0xffffffff;
> > > + inst->skip_frm_cnt = 0;
> > > + fallthrough;
> > > default:
> > > ret = vpu_enc_set_param(&inst->vpu_inst, type, enc_prm);
> > > break;
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_vp8_if.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> > > index 6426af514526..11abb191ada5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_vp8_if.c
> > > @@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ static int vp8_enc_encode_frame(struct venc_vp8_inst *inst,
> > >
> > > mtk_vcodec_debug(inst, "->frm_cnt=%d", inst->frm_cnt);
> > >
> > > - ret = vpu_enc_encode(&inst->vpu_inst, 0, frm_buf, bs_buf, bs_size);
> > > + ret = vpu_enc_encode(&inst->vpu_inst, 0, frm_buf, bs_buf, bs_size,
> > > + NULL);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_drv_if.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_drv_if.h
> > > index 52fc9cc812fc..51b52625ca22 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_drv_if.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_drv_if.h
> > > @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ struct venc_enc_param {
> > > unsigned int gop_size;
> > > };
> > >
> >
> > How about a comment here documenting this struct?
>
> Will comment if I can figure out what it is useful for. :)
>
> >
> > > +struct venc_frame_info {
> > > + unsigned int frm_cnt; /* per frame update */
> > > + unsigned int skip_frm_cnt; /* per frame update */
> >
> > I'd go for s/cnt/count, it's just 2 bytes
> > and in the long run it'll make our life easier.
>
> Ack.
>
> >
> > > + unsigned int frm_type; /* per frame update */
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * struct venc_frm_buf - frame buffer information used in venc_if_encode()
> > > * @fb_addr: plane frame buffer addresses
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_ipi_msg.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_ipi_msg.h
> > > index 28ee04ca6241..4cafbf92d9cd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_ipi_msg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_ipi_msg.h
> > > @@ -51,17 +51,22 @@ struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_init {
> > > * @vpu_inst_addr: VPU encoder instance addr
> > > * (struct venc_vp8_vsi/venc_h264_vsi *)
> > > * @param_id: parameter id (venc_set_param_type)
> > > - * @data_item: number of items in the data array
> > > + * @num_data: number of items in the data array
> > > * @data[8]: data array to store the set parameters
> > > */
> > > struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param {
> > > uint32_t msg_id;
> > > uint32_t vpu_inst_addr;
> > > uint32_t param_id;
> > > - uint32_t data_item;
> > > + uint32_t num_data;
> >
> > This change looks either out of place, or unneeded.
> > Or I'm missing something.
>
> Yeah, it's just renaming this member to something that makes more
> sense, "data_item" bringing absolutely no information about what this
> does. Will make an extra patch for it.
>
> >
> > > uint32_t data[8];
> > > };
> > >
> > > +struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param_ext {
> > > + struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param base;
> > > + uint32_t data_ext[24];
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc - AP to VPU enc cmd structure
> > > * @msg_id: message id (AP_IPIMSG_XXX_ENC_ENCODE)
> > > @@ -82,6 +87,12 @@ struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc {
> > > uint32_t bs_size;
> > > };
> > >
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> Ditto what? :) There is no code change right here.
>
Oh, sorry. I meant: same feedback about adding a comment
to the structure.
> >
> > > +struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc_ext {
> > > + struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc base;
> > > + uint32_t data_item;
> > > + uint32_t data[32];
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_deinit - AP to VPU deinit cmd structure
> > > * @msg_id: message id (AP_IPIMSG_XXX_ENC_DEINIT)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
> > > index 53854127814b..6c77bf025172 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
> > > @@ -116,49 +116,81 @@ int vpu_enc_init(struct venc_vpu_inst *vpu)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static unsigned int venc_enc_param_crop_right(struct venc_vpu_inst *vpu,
> > > + struct venc_enc_param *enc_prm)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned int img_crop_right = enc_prm->buf_width - enc_prm->width;
> > > +
> > > + return img_crop_right % 16;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned int venc_enc_param_crop_bottom(struct venc_enc_param *enc_prm)
> > > +{
> > > + return round_up(enc_prm->height, 16) - enc_prm->height;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static unsigned int venc_enc_param_num_mb(struct venc_enc_param *enc_prm)
> > > +{
> > > + return DIV_ROUND_UP(enc_prm->width, 16) *
> > > + DIV_ROUND_UP(enc_prm->height, 16);
> >
> > ^^^^
> > You could define the macroblock size in a macro and
> > use it in these various places.
>
> Ack.
>
> >
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > int vpu_enc_set_param(struct venc_vpu_inst *vpu,
> > > enum venc_set_param_type id,
> > > struct venc_enc_param *enc_param)
> > > {
> > > - struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param out;
> > > + const bool is_ext = vpu->ctx->dev->venc_pdata->uses_ext;
> > > + size_t msg_size = is_ext ?
> >
> > How about you use vpu->id to check for is_ext?
>
> Unfortunately vpu->id can be assigned an ipi_id or scp_ipi_id, which
> are two different namespaces and which values can thus collide. So we
> cannot use ID for this.
>
> >
> > I feel like querying the "is_ext" property like this
> > is a layering violation.
> >
> > Or maybe better some firmware interface type
> > should be set in struct venc_vpu_inst,
> > so the venc_vpu_if driver is aware of its own type.
>
> "is_ext" refers to whether the firmware uses an extended version of
> the protocol to communicate, so using it here seems to be in place.
Hm, maybe my comment wasn't really clear. I was trying
to point out that both venc_h264_if.c and venc_vpu_if.c
are using ctx->dev->venc_pdata->uses_ext to get
the "is_ext".
I.e. I would imagine it's cleaner to:
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
index 050787b2896c..1ad25b59356a 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc/venc_h264_if.c
@@ -513,6 +513,7 @@ static int h264_enc_init(struct mtk_vcodec_ctx *ctx)
inst->ctx = ctx;
inst->vpu_inst.ctx = ctx;
inst->vpu_inst.id = is_ext ? SCP_IPI_VENC_H264 : IPI_VENC_H264;
+ inst->vpu_inst.is_ext = is_ext;
inst->hw_base = mtk_vcodec_get_reg_addr(inst->ctx, VENC_SYS);
inst->frm_cnt = 0xffffffff;
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
index 472503701003..137453d66d8e 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-vcodec/venc_vpu_if.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ int vpu_enc_set_param(struct venc_vpu_inst *vpu,
enum venc_set_param_type id,
struct venc_enc_param *enc_param)
{
- const bool is_ext = vpu->ctx->dev->venc_pdata->uses_ext;
+ const bool is_ext = vpu->is_ext;
size_t msg_size = is_ext ?
sizeof(struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param_ext) :
sizeof(struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_set_param);
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ int vpu_enc_encode(struct venc_vpu_inst *vpu,
unsigned int bs_mode,
unsigned int *bs_size,
struct venc_frame_info *frame_info)
{
- const bool is_ext = vpu->ctx->dev->venc_pdata->uses_ext;
+ const bool is_ext = vpu->is_ext;
size_t msg_size = is_ext ?
sizeof(struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc_ext) :
sizeof(struct venc_ap_ipi_msg_enc);
IMHO, this makes the structure cleaner, but
possibly this is just bikeshedding, so feel free to ignore.
Cheers,
Ezequiel
