On Sun, Jul 05, 2020 at 11:19:18PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > +- pinctrl > > + add extra pinctrl to configure SCL/SDA pins to GPIO function for bus > > + recovery, call it "gpio" or "recovery" state > > I think we should stick with "gpio" only. That is what at91 and imx have > in their bindings. pxa uses "recovery" as a pinctrl state name but I > can't find any further use or documentation of that. PXA is not fully > converted to the best of my knowledge, so maybe it is no problem for PXA > to switch to "gpio", too? We should ask Russell King (cced). > > Russell, do you object naming the pinctrl state for bus recovery in > the pxa i2c driver from "recovery" to "gpio"? No response, so far. I suggest now to support the "recovery" naming but mark it as deprecated. Opinions?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
