On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 06/03/14 03:15, Julia Lawall wrote: > > Failure to terminate an of_device_id table can lead to confusing > > failures depending on where the compiler places the array. Add a > > check to make sure these tables are terminated. Thanks to Mitchel > > Humpherys for coming up with the pattern initially. > > > > Cc: Mitchel Humpherys <mitchelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > v3: Removed unneeded rule bad_of_table. Placed * in context rule on the > > closing brace; putting it on the field caused all fields to be marked. > > > > > These seem like only minor changes. Why was my authorship removed? Probably because I don't know how to provide a new vesion of the patch properly. What should I have done? There were quite a lot of modifications. It seemed easier to just send a complete new version. julia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
