On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:13 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add support for pinctrl-0 through pinctrl-8 explicitly instead of trying > to add support for pinctrl-%d properties. > > Of all the pinctrl-* properties in dts files (20322), only 47% (9531) > are pinctrl-%d properties. Of all the pinctrl-%d properties, 99.5% > (9486) are made up of pinctrl-[0-2]. > > Trying to parse all pinctrl-* properties and checking for pinctrl-%d is > unnecessarily complicated. So, just add support for pinctrl-[0-8] for > now. In the unlikely event we ever exceed pinctrl-8, we can come back > and improve this. It wasn't immediately clear from this that pinctrl-8 is the current max you found vs. a should be enough for a while. Pinctrl is also a bit special in that we have 100s of child nodes and only 1 to a few actual dependencies (the pinctrl node). I assume in the end here, it's just the pin controller node that's the dependency rather than creating lot's of dependencies? Rob
