Hi Rob,
On 7/21/20 11:40 AM, Suman Anna wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 7/21/20 10:53 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 5:48 PM Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote:
Add a bindings document that lists the common TI SCI properties
used by the K3 R5F and DSP remoteproc devices.
Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
---
v4: Addressed both of Rob's review comments on ti,sci-proc-ids property
v3: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11602317/
.../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml
diff --git
a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0dca2ffdbc48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only or BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,k3-sci-proc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Common TI K3 remote processor device bindings
+
+maintainers:
+ - Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
+
+description: |
+ The TI K3 family of SoCs usually have one or more remote processor
sub-systems
+ like the dual-core R5F sub-system or a C66x or C71x DSP processor
subsystem.
+ The device management of these remote processors is managed by a
dedicated
+ System Processor, and the communication with that processor is
managed through
+ the TI-SCI protocol.
+
+ Each remote processor device node should define a common set of
properties
+ that allows the System Processor firmware to perform the device
management
+ such as powering the IPs, asserting/deasserting the resets for
each of these
+ processors.
+
+properties:
+ ti,sci:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+ description:
+ Should be a phandle to the TI-SCI System Controller node
+
+ ti,sci-dev-id:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+ description: |
+ Should contain the TI-SCI device id corresponding to the
remote processor
+ core. Please refer to the corresponding System Controller
documentation
+ for valid values.
These also apply on Lokesh's series converting ti,sci-int[ra]
bindings. Please rework to use for both.
OK.
OK, I have reworked for this and posted it [1] as part of v5 of this series.
regards
Suman
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11676821/
+
+ ti,sci-proc-ids:
+ description: Should contain a single tuple of <proc_id host_id>.
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
+ items:
+ - description: TI-SCI processor id for the remote processor
device
+ - description: TI-SCI host id to which processor control
ownership
+ should be transferred to
This property is not required for the ti,sci-int[ra].
I can plan to move this to a common location like
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ and let the individual
bindings define the required properties. Does that sound ok to you?
regards
Suman
+
+required:
+ - ti,sci
+ - ti,sci-dev-id
+ - ti,sci-proc-ids
--
2.26.0
