On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:15:24AM +0300, Stanimir Varbanov wrote: > > Lately I've been working on rpm, rpm-smd, smem, smd, smsm, smp2p > > patches for mainline. > > It could be argued that smd is a bus and should go in drivers/bus, but > > for the rest I fear that we just created drivers/soc/qcom as another > > dumping ground for things; a "Qualcomm specific drivers/mfd". > Do we have some obstacles to not use a "common mailbox framework" for > this IPC (shared memory) communication. It looks that it fits very well > with our needs for this rpm-regulator and future submitting of smd driver? Jassi (CCed) has been working on just such a thing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
