On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 03:07:01PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Sergei Shtylyov > > The problem with LKML is that it's always suggested, even for the very > > minor patches that should not be of interest to the wide public. I'll keep > > in mind that the regulator patches are discussed on LKML. > Maybe a linux-regulator list would be helpful? We really don't have enough traffic for it to be useful I think - it's not like regulator is unique in this regard, there's plenty of other subsystems don't have a dedicated list. The only thing it might help with is patchwork which is too limited to pick things off of the main kernel list in any useful fashion.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
