On 7/4/20 6:38 AM, Clément Péron wrote:
> From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxx>
>
> H6 I2S is very similar to that in H3, except it supports up to 16
> channels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Cooper <codekipper@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Péron <peron.clem@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 227 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> index d0a8d5810c0a..9690389cb68e 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sunxi/sun4i-i2s.c
> @@ -124,6 +124,21 @@
> #define SUN8I_I2S_RX_CHAN_SEL_REG 0x54
> #define SUN8I_I2S_RX_CHAN_MAP_REG 0x58
>
> +/* Defines required for sun50i-h6 support */
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_OFFSET_MASK GENMASK(21, 20)
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_OFFSET(offset) ((offset) << 20)
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_MASK GENMASK(19, 16)
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL(chan) ((chan - 1) << 16)
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_EN_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_EN(num_chan) (((1 << num_chan) - 1))
> +
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_MAP0_REG 0x44
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_MAP1_REG 0x48
> +
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_RX_CHAN_SEL_REG 0x64
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_RX_CHAN_MAP0_REG 0x68
> +#define SUN50I_H6_I2S_RX_CHAN_MAP1_REG 0x6C
> +
> struct sun4i_i2s;
>
> /**
> @@ -466,6 +481,65 @@ static int sun8i_i2s_set_chan_cfg(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int sun50i_i2s_set_chan_cfg(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s,
> + const struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
> +{
> + unsigned int channels = params_channels(params);
> + unsigned int slots = channels;
> + unsigned int lrck_period;
> +
> + if (i2s->slots)
> + slots = i2s->slots;
> +
> + /* Map the channels for playback and capture */
> + regmap_write(i2s->regmap, SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_MAP1_REG, 0x76543210);
> + regmap_write(i2s->regmap, SUN50I_H6_I2S_RX_CHAN_MAP1_REG, 0x76543210);
> +
> + /* Configure the channels */
> + regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, SUN8I_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_REG,
> + SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_MASK,
> + SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL(channels));
> + regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, SUN50I_H6_I2S_RX_CHAN_SEL_REG,
> + SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_MASK,
> + SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL(channels));
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, SUN8I_I2S_CHAN_CFG_REG,
> + SUN8I_I2S_CHAN_CFG_TX_SLOT_NUM_MASK,
> + SUN8I_I2S_CHAN_CFG_TX_SLOT_NUM(channels));
> + regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, SUN8I_I2S_CHAN_CFG_REG,
> + SUN8I_I2S_CHAN_CFG_RX_SLOT_NUM_MASK,
> + SUN8I_I2S_CHAN_CFG_RX_SLOT_NUM(channels));
> +
> + switch (i2s->format & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_FORMAT_MASK) {
> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP_A:
> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_DSP_B:
> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_LEFT_J:
> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_RIGHT_J:
According to the manual, LEFT_J and RIGHT_J should use the same calculation as
I2S, not the one for PCM/DSP.
> + lrck_period = params_physical_width(params) * slots;
> + break;
> +
> + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_I2S:
> + lrck_period = params_physical_width(params);
> + break;
> +
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (i2s->slot_width)
> + lrck_period = i2s->slot_width;
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, SUN4I_I2S_FMT0_REG,
> + SUN8I_I2S_FMT0_LRCK_PERIOD_MASK,
> + SUN8I_I2S_FMT0_LRCK_PERIOD(lrck_period));
>From the description in the manual, this looks off by one. The number of BCLKs
per LRCK is LRCK_PERIOD + 1.
> +
> + regmap_update_bits(i2s->regmap, SUN8I_I2S_TX_CHAN_SEL_REG,
> + SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_EN_MASK,
> + SUN50I_H6_I2S_TX_CHAN_EN(channels));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int sun4i_i2s_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params,
> struct snd_soc_dai *dai)
> @@ -691,6 +765,108 @@ static int sun8i_i2s_set_soc_fmt(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int sun50i_i2s_set_soc_fmt(const struct sun4i_i2s *i2s,
> + unsigned int fmt)
> +{
> + u32 mode, val;
> + u8 offset;
> +
> + /*
> + * DAI clock polarity
> + *
> + * The setup for LRCK contradicts the datasheet, but under a
> + * scope it's clear that the LRCK polarity is reversed
> + * compared to the expected polarity on the bus.
> + */
This comment makes us sound a lot more confident than I think we actually are.
Regards,
Samuel
