On Friday, May 30, 2014 02:31:15 PM Thomas Abraham wrote: > Changes since v5: > - Fixes for checkpatch warnings with --strict option as suggested by > Nishanth Menon. > > Changes since v4: > - Code improvements suggested by Viresh Kumar. > > Changes since v3: > - Minor changes as suggested in the last version. > > Changes since v2: > - Reworked based on the "PM / OPP: move cpufreq specific helpers out of OPP > layer" patch series posted by Nishanth Menon. > > Changes since v1: > - Boost mode frequencies are specfied as a set of frequencies instead of > specifying them as OPPs. Thanks to Nishanth, Lukasz and Rob for the > feedback. > > This series has been acked by authors and maintainers of the code > portions changed in this series. The new DT binding introduced in this > patch needs an ack from device tree binding maintainers as well. > > Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds > support for CPU boost mode for CPUfreq drivers. To use the new boost > mode, CPUfreq drivers have to specify the boost mode frequency and > voltage within the CPUfreq driver, which is the case for Exynos4x12 > CPUfreq driver. > > But for CPUfreq drivers which obtain the OPPs from cpus node, this > patch series adds support to specify boost mode frequencies in the > cpu device tree node. This requirement came up when Lukasz pointed > out the regression caused by the Exynos CPUfreq driver consolidation > patches. Both patches queued up for 3.16 in the linux-pm tree. Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html