Hi Alain, > Ok, understood. Fine for me that way as well. I am just a little worrying that > the "host-notify" can now be present in both controller AND slave nodes > and might be a bit hard to understand. At the same time I don't have a better > proposal for naming the binding for the controller. It is a valid concern, maybe we could name the binding for the host "enable-host-notify"? > Please do not consider serie v2 I just posted few days ago and I will > post a serie v3 updating the binding information and using the host-notify > binding in the i2c-stm32f7 driver. I also have an idea for the SMBusAlert topic, hopefully I can come up with a summary later today. All the best, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
