Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] drm/panel: simple: Add Satoz SAT050AT40H12R2 panel support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent,

[...]

> >  
> > +static const struct display_timing satoz_sat050at40h12r2_timing = {
> > +	.pixelclock = {33300000, 33300000, 50000000},
> > +	.hactive = {800, 800, 800},
> > +	.hfront_porch = {16, 210, 354},
> > +	.hback_porch = {46, 46, 46},
> > +	.hsync_len = {1, 1, 40},
> > +	.vactive = {480, 480, 480},
> > +	.vfront_porch = {7, 22, 147},
> > +	.vback_porch = {23, 23, 23},
> > +	.vsync_len = {1, 1, 20},
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct panel_desc satoz_sat050at40h12r2 = {
> > +	.timings = &satoz_sat050at40h12r2_timing,
> > +	.num_timings = 1,
> > +	.bpc = 8,
> > +	.size = {
> > +		.width = 108,
> > +		.height = 65,
> > +	},
> > +	.bus_format = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24,
> > +	.connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS,  
> 
> I'm trying to fix inconsistencies in the panel-simple driver, and this
> caught my eyes. MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X24 isn't a correct format for
> LVDS panels. MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB666_1X7X3_SPWG,
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG or MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_JEIDA
> should be used instead. As I couldn't find documentation for the panel,
> I can't tell which format is correct. Could you please help ?

Indeed, I got this datasheet under NDA.

We checked with Paul, we think the right format is:
MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_1X7X4_SPWG.

Thanks,
Miquèl



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux