On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 22:35:47 +0300
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add support for Thermal Monitoring part of PMIC5. This part is closely
> coupled with ADC, using it's channels directly. ADC-TM support
> generating interrupts on ADC value crossing low or high voltage bounds,
> which is used to support thermal trip points.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
This may well overlap with Bjorn's comments though I'll avoid those
I can remember from quickly scanning through his review.
Anyhow various random comments inline.
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.c | 67 +++
> drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.h | 3 +
> drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig | 11 +
> drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c | 617 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 699 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.c b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.c
> index ffa578ce76db..e470beb8c6f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,47 @@ static int qcom_vadc_map_voltage_temp(const struct vadc_map_pt *pts,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static s32 qcom_vadc_map_temp_voltage(const struct vadc_map_pt *pts,
> + u32 tablesize, int input)
> +{
> + bool descending = 1;
> + u32 i = 0;
> +
> + /* Check if table is descending or ascending */
> + if (tablesize > 1) {
> + if (pts[0].y < pts[1].y)
> + descending = 0;
> + }
> +
> + while (i < tablesize) {
> + if ((descending) && (pts[i].y < input)) {
> + /* table entry is less than measured*/
> + /* value and table is descending, stop */
> + break;
> + } else if ((!descending) &&
> + (pts[i].y > input)) {
> + /* table entry is greater than measured*/
> + /*value and table is ascending, stop */
> + break;
> + }
> + i++;
> + }
> +
> + if (i == 0)
> + return pts[0].x;
> + if (i == tablesize)
> + return pts[tablesize - 1].x;
> +
> + /* result is between search_index and search_index-1 */
> + /* interpolate linearly */
> + return (((s32)((pts[i].x - pts[i - 1].x) *
> + (input - pts[i - 1].y)) /
> + (pts[i].y - pts[i - 1].y)) +
> + pts[i - 1].x);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void qcom_vadc_scale_calib(const struct vadc_linear_graph *calib_graph,
> u16 adc_code,
> bool absolute,
> @@ -273,6 +314,19 @@ static int qcom_vadc_scale_chg_temp(const struct vadc_linear_graph *calib_graph,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u16 qcom_vadc_scale_voltage_code(int voltage,
> + const struct vadc_prescale_ratio *prescale,
> + const u32 full_scale_code_volt,
> + unsigned int factor)
> +{
> + s64 volt = voltage, adc_vdd_ref_mv = 1875;
> +
> + volt *= prescale->num * factor * full_scale_code_volt;
> + volt = div64_s64(volt, (s64)prescale->den * adc_vdd_ref_mv * 1000);
> +
> + return volt;
> +}
> +
> static int qcom_vadc_scale_code_voltage_factor(u16 adc_code,
> const struct vadc_prescale_ratio *prescale,
> const struct adc5_data *data,
> @@ -396,6 +450,19 @@ int qcom_vadc_scale(enum vadc_scale_fn_type scaletype,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_vadc_scale);
>
> +u16 qcom_adc_tm5_temp_volt_scale(unsigned int prescale_ratio,
> + u32 full_scale_code_volt, int temp)
> +{
> + const struct vadc_prescale_ratio *prescale = &adc5_prescale_ratios[prescale_ratio];
> + s32 voltage;
> +
> + voltage = qcom_vadc_map_temp_voltage(adcmap_100k_104ef_104fb_1875_vref,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(adcmap_100k_104ef_104fb_1875_vref),
> + temp);
> + return qcom_vadc_scale_voltage_code(voltage, prescale, full_scale_code_volt, 1000);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(qcom_adc_tm5_temp_volt_scale);
> +
> int qcom_adc5_hw_scale(enum vadc_scale_fn_type scaletype,
> unsigned int prescale_ratio,
> const struct adc5_data *data,
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.h b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.h
> index 2c65ddc98696..978820443d8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.h
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.h
> @@ -157,6 +157,9 @@ int qcom_adc5_hw_scale(enum vadc_scale_fn_type scaletype,
> const struct adc5_data *data,
> u16 adc_code, int *result_mdec);
>
> +u16 qcom_adc_tm5_temp_volt_scale(unsigned int prescale_ratio,
> + u32 full_scale_code_volt, int temp);
> +
> int qcom_adc5_prescaling_from_dt(u32 num, u32 den);
>
> int qcom_adc5_hw_settle_time_from_dt(u32 value,
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig
> index aa9c1d80fae4..c61df55760e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -20,3 +20,14 @@ config QCOM_SPMI_TEMP_ALARM
> trip points. The temperature reported by the thermal sensor reflects the
> real time die temperature if an ADC is present or an estimate of the
> temperature based upon the over temperature stage value.
> +
> +config QCOM_SPMI_ADC_TM5
> + tristate "Qualcomm SPMI PMIC Thermal Monitor ADC5"
> + depends on OF && SPMI && IIO
> + select REGMAP_SPMI
> + select QCOM_VADC_COMMON
> + help
> + This enables the thermal driver for the ADC thermal monitoring
> + device. It shows up as a thermal zone with multiple trip points.
> + Thermal client sets threshold temperature for both warm and cool and
> + gets updated when a threshold is reached.
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile
> index ec86eef7f6a6..5b9445a3fd26 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -4,3 +4,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_TSENS) += qcom_tsens.o
> qcom_tsens-y += tsens.o tsens-v2.o tsens-v1.o tsens-v0_1.o \
> tsens-8960.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SPMI_TEMP_ALARM) += qcom-spmi-temp-alarm.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SPMI_ADC_TM5) += qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.o
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ebfe0c9fbf96
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,617 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2012-2020, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Linaro Limited
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/iio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
> +
> +#include "../../iio/adc/qcom-vadc-common.h"
> +
> +#define ADC5_MAX_CHANNEL 0xc0
> +#define ADC_TM5_NUM_CHANNELS 8
> +#define ADC_TM5_TIMER1 3 /* 3.9ms */
> +#define ADC_TM5_TIMER2 10 /* 1 second */
> +#define ADC_TM5_TIMER3 4 /* 4 second */
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_STATUS_LOW 0x0a
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_STATUS_HIGH 0x0b
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_NUM_BTM 0x0f
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_ADC_DIG_PARAM 0x42
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_FAST_AVG_CTL 0x43
> +#define ADC_TM5_FAST_AVG_EN BIT(7)
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL 0x44
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL2 0x45
Perhaps naming can make it clear what is a register address and
what is a field location etc? GENMASK preferred for masks.
FIELD_PREP and friends might also make this more readable.
> +#define ADC_TM5_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL2_SHIFT 0x4
> +#define ADC_TM5_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL2_MASK 0xf0
> +#define ADC_TM5_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL3_MASK 0xf
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_EN(n) ((n * 8) + 0x67)
Perhaps move this so it's in the obvious place in the sequence below?
Also not convinced on the lower case n in the middle of the defines.
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_EN BIT(7)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_HIGH_THR_INT_EN BIT(1)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR_INT_EN BIT(0)
> +
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_ADC_CH_SEL_CTL(n) ((n * 8) + 0x60)
While is more verbose, perhaps it's worth making it more apparent that
this is blocks of 8 registers per channel all offset by 0x60
#define ADC_TM5_Mn_CHAN_BASE 0x60
#define ADC_TM5_Mn_ADC_CH_SE_CTL(b) (ADC_TM5_Mn_CHAN_BASE + (n * 8) + 0)
#define ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR0(n) (ADC_TM5_Mn_CHAN_BASE + (n * 8) + 1)
etc?
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR0(n) ((n * 8) + 0x61)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR1(n) ((n * 8) + 0x62)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_HIGH_THR0(n) ((n * 8) + 0x63)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_HIGH_THR1(n) ((n * 8) + 0x64)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL(n) ((n * 8) + 0x65)
> +#define ADC_TM5_Mn_CTL(n) ((n * 8) + 0x66)
Here for ADC_TM5_Mn_EN(n) perhaps?
> +#define ADC_TM5_CTL_HW_SETTLE_DELAY_MASK 0xf
> +#define ADC_TM5_CTL_CAL_SEL 0x30
> +#define ADC_TM5_CTL_CAL_SEL_MASK_SHIFT 4
> +#define ADC_TM5_CTL_CAL_VAL 0x40
> +
> +enum adc5_timer_select {
> + ADC5_TIMER_SEL_1 = 0,
> + ADC5_TIMER_SEL_2,
> + ADC5_TIMER_SEL_3,
> + ADC5_TIMER_SEL_NONE,
> +};
> +
> +struct adc_tm5_data {
> + const u32 full_scale_code_volt;
> + unsigned int *decimation;
> + unsigned int *hw_settle;
> +};
> +
> +enum adc_tm5_cal_method {
> + ADC_TM5_NO_CAL = 0,
> + ADC_TM5_RATIOMETRIC_CAL,
> + ADC_TM5_ABSOLUTE_CAL
> +};
> +
> +struct adc_tm5_chip;
> +
> +struct adc_tm5_channel {
> + unsigned int channel;
> + unsigned int adc_channel;
> + enum adc_tm5_cal_method cal_method;
> + unsigned int prescale;
> + unsigned int hw_settle_time;
> + struct iio_channel *iio;
> + struct adc_tm5_chip *chip;
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> +};
> +
> +struct adc_tm5_chip {
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + struct device *dev;
> + struct adc_tm5_channel *channels;
> + const struct adc_tm5_data *data;
> + spinlock_t reg_lock;
Even with the naming making it fairly clear, a lock should have explicit
docs on what its scope is.
> + unsigned int decimation;
> + unsigned int avg_samples;
> + unsigned int timer1;
Some elements in here are non obvious enough in function that some docs
might be good.
> + unsigned int timer2;
> + unsigned int timer3;
> + unsigned int nchannels;
> + u16 base;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm5_data_pmic = {
> + .full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> + .decimation = (unsigned int []) {250, 420, 840},
> + .hw_settle = (unsigned int []) {15, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> + 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128},
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id adc_tm5_match_table[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc-tm5",
> + .data = &adc_tm5_data_pmic,
> + },
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, adc_tm5_match_table);
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_read(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, u16 offset, u8 *data, int len)
> +{
> + return regmap_bulk_read(adc_tm->regmap, adc_tm->base + offset, data, len);
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_write(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, u16 offset, u8 *data, int len)
> +{
> + return regmap_bulk_write(adc_tm->regmap, adc_tm->base + offset, data, len);
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_reg_update(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, u16 offset, u8 mask, u8 val)
> +{
> + return regmap_write_bits(adc_tm->regmap, adc_tm->base + offset, mask, val);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t adc_tm5_isr(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct adc_tm5_chip *chip = data;
> + u8 status_low, status_high, ctl;
> + int ret = 0, i = 0;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_read(chip, ADC_TM5_STATUS_LOW, &status_low, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "read status low failed with %d\n", ret);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_read(chip, ADC_TM5_STATUS_HIGH, &status_high, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "read status high failed with %d\n", ret);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->nchannels; i++) {
> + bool upper_set = false, lower_set = false;
> + unsigned int ch = chip->channels[i].channel;
> +
> + if (!chip->channels[i].tzd) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "thermal device not found\n");
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->reg_lock, flags);
> + ret = adc_tm5_read(chip, ADC_TM5_Mn_EN(ch), &ctl, 1);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->reg_lock, flags);
> +
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "ctl read failed with %d\n", ret);
> + goto fail;
> + }
> +
> + if ((status_low & BIT(ch)) && (ctl & ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_EN)
> + && (ctl & ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR_INT_EN))
Alignment of these is making them a little hard to read.
if ((status_low & BIT(ch) &&
(ctl & ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_EN) &&
(ctl & ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR_INT_EN))
perhaps?
Or maybe just treat them as a boolean assignment
lower_set = (status_low & BIT(ch)) ...
> + lower_set = true;
> +
> + if ((status_high & BIT(ch)) && (ctl & ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_EN) &&
> + (ctl & ADC_TM5_Mn_HIGH_THR_INT_EN))
> + upper_set = true;
> +fail:
Why is fail here? upper_set == false, lower_set == false if we get
here so the next bit doesn't run anyway. So goto fail: seems to be the
same as continue;
> +
> + if (upper_set || lower_set)
> + thermal_zone_device_update(chip->channels[i].tzd,
> + THERMAL_EVENT_UNSPECIFIED);
> + }
> +
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_get_temp(void *data, int *temp)
> +{
> + struct adc_tm5_channel *channel = data;
> + int ret, milli_celsius;
> +
> + if (!channel || !channel->iio)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = iio_read_channel_processed(channel->iio, &milli_celsius);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
Personally slight preference for if (ret) to make it clear good == 0.
> +
> + *temp = milli_celsius;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_disable_channel(struct adc_tm5_channel *channel)
> +{
> + struct adc_tm5_chip *chip = channel->chip;
> + unsigned int reg = ADC_TM5_Mn_EN(channel->channel);
> +
> + return adc_tm5_reg_update(chip, reg,
> + ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_EN | ADC_TM5_Mn_HIGH_THR_INT_EN | ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR_INT_EN,
> + 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_configure(struct adc_tm5_channel *channel, u8 *low_thr, u8 *high_thr)
> +{
> + struct adc_tm5_chip *chip = channel->chip;
> + u8 buf[8], cal_method;
> + u16 reg = ADC_TM5_Mn_ADC_CH_SEL_CTL(channel->channel);
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_read(chip, reg, buf, 8);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "block read failed with %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update ADC channel select */
> + buf[0] = channel->adc_channel;
> +
> + if (low_thr) {
> + buf[1] = low_thr[0];
> + buf[2] = low_thr[1];
As mentioned below, this would be nicer as an explicit put_unaligned*
> + buf[7] |= ADC_TM5_Mn_LOW_THR_INT_EN;
> + }
> +
> + if (high_thr) {
> + buf[3] = high_thr[0];
> + buf[4] = high_thr[1];
> + buf[7] |= ADC_TM5_Mn_HIGH_THR_INT_EN;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update timer select */
> + buf[5] = ADC5_TIMER_SEL_2;
> +
> + /* Set calibration select, hw_settle delay */
> + cal_method = (u8) (channel->cal_method << ADC_TM5_CTL_CAL_SEL_MASK_SHIFT);
> + buf[6] &= (u8) ~ADC_TM5_CTL_HW_SETTLE_DELAY_MASK;
> + buf[6] |= (u8) channel->hw_settle_time;
> + buf[6] &= (u8) ~ADC_TM5_CTL_CAL_SEL;
> + buf[6] |= (u8) cal_method;
> +
> + buf[7] |= ADC_TM5_Mn_MEAS_EN;
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_write(chip, reg, buf, 8);
> + if (ret < 0) {
Personally I prefer to do if (ret) for regmap error checks as
they can never be positive.
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "buf write failed\n");
> + return ret;
Drop the return ret out of brackets given it will be 0 if we aren't
in here anyway.
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_set_trip_temp(void *data,
> + int low_temp, int high_temp)
> +{
> + struct adc_tm5_channel *channel = data;
> + struct adc_tm5_chip *chip;
> + u8 trip_high_thr[2], trip_low_thr[2];
These look awfully like 16 bit value shoved into byte pairs.
Can we not just do what ever is need to keep them as appropriate
__?e16 values? Looks like an unaligned put will be needed but
it would still be more readable I think.
> + u8 *trip_high_ptr = NULL, *trip_low_ptr = NULL;
> + int ret;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + if (!channel)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + dev_info(channel->chip->dev, "%d:low_temp(mdegC):%d, high_temp(mdegC):%d\n",
> + channel->channel, low_temp, high_temp);
I'm going to guess that info is all available from elsewhere? Looks like log
spamming at first glance. Still I don't know thermal that well so maybe
this is standard?
> + chip = channel->chip;
> +
> + /* Warm temperature corresponds to low voltage threshold */
> + if (high_temp != INT_MAX) {
> + u16 adc_code = qcom_adc_tm5_temp_volt_scale(channel->prescale,
> + chip->data->full_scale_code_volt, high_temp);
> +
> + trip_low_thr[0] = adc_code & 0xff;
> + trip_low_thr[1] = adc_code >> 8;
> + trip_low_ptr = trip_low_thr;
> + }
> +
> + /* Cool temperature corresponds to high voltage threshold */
> + if (low_temp != -INT_MAX) {
> + u16 adc_code = qcom_adc_tm5_temp_volt_scale(channel->prescale,
> + chip->data->full_scale_code_volt, low_temp);
> +
> + trip_high_thr[0] = adc_code & 0xff;
> + trip_high_thr[1] = adc_code >> 8;
> + trip_high_ptr = trip_high_thr;
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->reg_lock, flags);
> + if (high_temp == INT_MAX && low_temp == INT_MIN)
> + ret = adc_tm5_disable_channel(channel);
> + else
> + ret = adc_tm5_configure(channel, trip_low_ptr, trip_high_ptr);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->reg_lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops adc_tm5_ops = {
> + .get_temp = adc_tm5_get_temp,
> + .set_trips = adc_tm5_set_trip_temp,
> +};
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_register_tzd(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < adc_tm->nchannels; i++) {
> + adc_tm->channels[i].chip = adc_tm;
> +
> + tzd = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(
> + adc_tm->dev, adc_tm->channels[i].channel,
> + &adc_tm->channels[i], &adc_tm5_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(tzd)) {
> + dev_err(adc_tm->dev, "Error registering TZ zone:%ld for channel:%d\n",
> + PTR_ERR(tzd), adc_tm->channels[i].channel);
> + continue;
> + }
> + adc_tm->channels[i].tzd = tzd;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_init(struct adc_tm5_chip *chip)
> +{
> + u8 buf[4], channels_available, meas_int_timer_2_3 = 0;
> + int ret;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_read(chip, ADC_TM5_NUM_BTM, &channels_available, 1);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "read failed for BTM channels\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_read(chip, ADC_TM5_ADC_DIG_PARAM, buf, 4);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "block read failed with %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + /* Select decimation */
> + buf[0] = chip->decimation;
> +
> + /* Select number of samples in fast average mode */
> + buf[1] = chip->avg_samples | ADC_TM5_FAST_AVG_EN;
> +
> + /* Select timer1 */
> + buf[2] = chip->timer1;
> +
> + /* Select timer2 and timer3 */
> + meas_int_timer_2_3 |= chip->timer2 <<
> + ADC_TM5_MEAS_INTERVAL_CTL2_SHIFT;
Take advantage of new slightly more relaxed line length rules and just
put the above on one line for readability.
There are other places in the driver that would benefit from that as well.
> + meas_int_timer_2_3 |= chip->timer3;
> + buf[3] = meas_int_timer_2_3;
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_write(chip,
> + ADC_TM5_ADC_DIG_PARAM, buf, 4);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "block write failed with %d\n", ret);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < chip->nchannels; i++) {
> + if (chip->channels[i].channel >= channels_available) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Invalid channel %d\n", chip->channels[i].channel);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_get_dt_channel_data(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm,
> + struct adc_tm5_channel *prop,
> + struct device_node *node,
> + const struct adc_tm5_data *data)
> +{
> + const char *name = node->name;
> + u32 chan, value, varr[2];
> + int ret;
> + struct device *dev = adc_tm->dev;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", &chan);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid channel number %s\n", name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + if (chan >= ADC_TM5_NUM_CHANNELS) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s invalid channel number %d\n", name, chan);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* the channel has DT description */
> + prop->channel = chan;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,adc-channel", &chan);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid channel number %s\n", name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + if (chan >= ADC5_MAX_CHANNEL) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s invalid ADC channel number %d\n", name, chan);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + prop->adc_channel = chan;
> +
> + prop->iio = devm_iio_channel_get(adc_tm->dev, name);
> + if (IS_ERR(prop->iio)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(prop->iio);
> + prop->iio = NULL;
> + dev_err(dev, "error getting channel %s: %d\n", name, ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "qcom,pre-scaling", varr, 2);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = qcom_adc5_prescaling_from_dt(varr[0], varr[1]);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%02x invalid pre-scaling <%d %d>\n",
> + chan, varr[0], varr[1]);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + prop->prescale = ret;
> + } else {
> + prop->prescale = 0; /*1:1 is index 0 */
/* 1:1...
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,hw-settle-time", &value);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = qcom_adc5_hw_settle_time_from_dt(value,
> + data->hw_settle);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%02x invalid hw-settle-time %d us\n",
> + chan, value);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + prop->hw_settle_time = ret;
> + } else {
> + prop->hw_settle_time = VADC_DEF_HW_SETTLE_TIME;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "qcom,ratiometric"))
> + prop->cal_method = ADC_TM5_RATIOMETRIC_CAL;
> + else
> + prop->cal_method = ADC_TM5_ABSOLUTE_CAL;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "%02x name %s\n", chan, name);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_get_dt_data(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct adc_tm5_channel *channels;
> + struct device_node *child;
> + unsigned int index = 0;
> + const struct of_device_id *id;
> + const struct adc_tm5_data *data;
> + u32 value;
> + int ret;
> + struct device *dev = adc_tm->dev;
> +
> + adc_tm->nchannels = of_get_available_child_count(node);
> + if (!adc_tm->nchannels)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + adc_tm->channels = devm_kcalloc(adc_tm->dev, adc_tm->nchannels,
> + sizeof(*adc_tm->channels), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!adc_tm->channels)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + channels = adc_tm->channels;
> +
> + id = of_match_node(adc_tm5_match_table, node);
> + if (id)
> + data = id->data;
> + else
> + data = &adc_tm5_data_pmic;
> + adc_tm->data = data;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,decimation", &value);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = qcom_adc5_decimation_from_dt(value, data->decimation);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid decimation %d\n",
> + value);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + adc_tm->decimation = ret;
> + } else {
> + adc_tm->decimation = ADC5_DECIMATION_DEFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "qcom,avg-samples", &value);
> + if (!ret) {
> + ret = qcom_adc5_avg_samples_from_dt(value);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "invalid avg-samples %d\n",
> + value);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + adc_tm->avg_samples = ret;
> + } else {
> + adc_tm->avg_samples = VADC_DEF_AVG_SAMPLES;
> + }
> +
> + adc_tm->timer1 = ADC_TM5_TIMER1;
> + adc_tm->timer2 = ADC_TM5_TIMER2;
> + adc_tm->timer3 = ADC_TM5_TIMER3;
> +
> + for_each_available_child_of_node(node, child) {
> + ret = adc_tm5_get_dt_channel_data(adc_tm, channels, child, data);
> + if (ret) {
> + of_node_put(child);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + channels++;
> + index++;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
Personally I slightly prefer the generic firmware property stuff now we have
it but I guess this driver is never going to be probed from anything other
than DT.
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm;
> + struct regmap *regmap;
> + int ret, irq;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + regmap = dev_get_regmap(dev->parent, NULL);
> + if (!regmap)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "reg", ®);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + adc_tm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*adc_tm), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!adc_tm)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + adc_tm->regmap = regmap;
> + adc_tm->dev = dev;
> + adc_tm->base = reg;
> + spin_lock_init(&adc_tm->reg_lock);
> +
> + irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "get_irq failed: %d\n", irq);
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_get_dt_data(adc_tm, node);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "get dt data failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_init(adc_tm);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "adc-tm init failed\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = adc_tm5_register_tzd(adc_tm);
Handle that ret;
> +
> + ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, adc_tm5_isr, 0,
> + "pm-adc-tm5", adc_tm);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
As Bjorn said, drop the platform_set_drvdata which then
lets you do simply
return devm_request_irq
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, adc_tm);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int adc_tm5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct platform_driver adc_tm5_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "spmi-adc-tm5",
> + .of_match_table = adc_tm5_match_table,
> + },
> + .probe = adc_tm5_probe,
> + .remove = adc_tm5_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(adc_tm5_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:spmi-adc-tm5");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SPMI PMIC Thermal Monitor ADC driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
