Hi Ricardo, Thank you for the patch. On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > Make the ports node optional, since there are some DTs that don't define > any ports for ti,tfp410. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo <ricardo.canuelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Shouldn't we fix those DTs instead ? What's the point of a TFP410 without ports in DT ? > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml > index 605831c1e836..1c9421eb80fa 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml > @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ properties: > > required: > - compatible > - - ports > > if: > required: -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
