Hi Florian,
> El 10 jun 2020, a las 4:27, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
>
>
> On 6/9/2020 4:30 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> +static const struct clk_bcm63xx_table_entry bcm6318_clocks[] = {
>> + { .name = "adsl_asb", .bit = 0, },
>> + { .name = "usb_asb", .bit = 1, },
>> + { .name = "mips_asb", .bit = 2, },
>> + { .name = "pcie_asb", .bit = 3, },
>> + { .name = "phymips_asb", .bit = 4, },
>> + { .name = "robosw_asb", .bit = 5, },
>> + { .name = "sar_asb", .bit = 6, },
>> + { .name = "sdr_asb", .bit = 7, },
>> + { .name = "swreg_asb", .bit = 8, },
>> + { .name = "periph_asb", .bit = 9, },
>> + { .name = "cpubus160", .bit = 10, },
>> + { .name = "adsl", .bit = 11, },
>> + { .name = "sar124", .bit = 12, },
>
> Nit: this should be sar125
Nice catch, I will fix this in v2.
>
>> + { .name = "mips", .bit = 13, .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL, },
>> + { .name = "pcie", .bit = 14, },
>> + { .name = "robosw250", .bit = 16, },
>> + { .name = "robosw025", .bit = 17, },
>> + { .name = "sdr", .bit = 19, .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL, },
>> + { .name = "usb", .bit = 20, },
>
> This should probably be "usbd" to indicate this is the USB device clock
> (not host)
Ok, I will change it. I got confused by the fact that both (usbd and usbh) were present on 6318_map_part.h:
#define USBD_CLK_EN (1 << 20)
#define USBH_CLK_EN (1 << 20)
>
> With that fixed:
>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> --
> Florian
