On 6/5/20 3:50 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:24 PM Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Am 2020-06-05 10:14, schrieb Andy Shevchenko: >>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 12:14 AM Michael Walle <michael@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > >>>> +static bool nowayout = WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT; >>>> +module_param(nowayout, bool, 0); >>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(nowayout, "Watchdog cannot be stopped once started >>>> (default=" >>>> + __MODULE_STRING(WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT) >>>> ")"); >>>> + >>>> +static int timeout; >>>> +module_param(timeout, int, 0); >>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(timeout, "Initial watchdog timeout in seconds"); >>> >>> Guenter ACKed this, but I'm wondering why we still need module >>> parameters... >> >> How would a user change the nowayout or the timeout? For the latter >> there is >> a device tree entry, but thats not easy changable by the user. > > Yes, it's more question to VIm and Guenter than to you. > Has support for providing module parameters with the kernel command line been discontinued/deprecated, or did it run out of favor ? Sorry if I missed that. nowayout has a configuration default. A module parameter is sometimes provided by drivers to be able to override it. The timeout provided via devicetree or on the command line is only the initial/default timeout, and the watchdog daemon can change it after opening the watchdog device as it sees fit. Guenter