On 04-06-20, 03:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> Add temperature alarm and thermal zone configuration to all three
> pm8150 instances. Configuration is largely based on the msm-4.19 tree.
> These alarms use main adc of the pmic. Separate temperature adc is not
> supported yet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150.dtsi | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150b.dtsi | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150l.dtsi | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150.dtsi
> index c0b197458665..fee2db42f4cb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pm8150.dtsi
> @@ -30,6 +30,15 @@ pwrkey {
> };
> };
>
> + pm8150_temp: temp-alarm@2400 {
> + compatible = "qcom,spmi-temp-alarm";
> + reg = <0x2400>;
> + interrupts = <0x0 0x24 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>;
> + io-channels = <&pm8150_adc ADC5_DIE_TEMP>;
> + io-channel-names = "thermal";
> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> pm8150_adc: adc@3100 {
> compatible = "qcom,spmi-adc5";
> reg = <0x3100>;
> @@ -38,8 +47,6 @@ pm8150_adc: adc@3100 {
> #io-channel-cells = <1>;
> interrupts = <0x0 0x31 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
>
> - status = "disabled";
> -
This should not be removed, rather than this please add enabled in you
board dts file
> ref-gnd@0 {
> reg = <ADC5_REF_GND>;
> qcom,pre-scaling = <1 1>;
> @@ -85,3 +92,33 @@ pmic@1 {
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
> };
> +
> +&thermal_zones {
> + pm8150_temp {
> + polling-delay-passive = <0>;
> + polling-delay = <0>;
> +
> + thermal-sensors = <&pm8150_temp>;
> +
> + trips {
> + trip0 {
> + temperature = <95000>;
> + hysteresis = <0>;
> + type = "passive";
> + };
> +
> + trip1 {
> + temperature = <115000>;
> + hysteresis = <0>;
> + type = "passive";
> + };
> +
> + trip2 {
> + temperature = <145000>;
> + hysteresis = <0>;
> + type = "passive";
> + };
> + };
> +
> + };
Not sure about this, Amit..? Should this also not be in board dts?
Similar comments on similar ones for rest of the patch as well..
--
~Vinod
