On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 15:49, Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Emil, > > On 2020-06-02 19:43, Emil Velikov wrote: > > Hi Krishna, > > > > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 at 08:17, Krishna Manikandan > > <mkrishn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Define shutdown callback for display drm driver, > >> so as to disable all the CRTCS when shutdown > >> notification is received by the driver. > >> > >> This change will turn off the timing engine so > >> that no display transactions are requested > >> while mmu translations are getting disabled > >> during reboot sequence. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krishna Manikandan <mkrishn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > AFAICT atomics is setup in msm_drm_ops::bind and shutdown in > > msm_drm_ops::unbind. > > > > Are you saying that unbind never triggers? If so, then we should > > really fix that instead, since this patch seems more like a > > workaround. > > > > Which path do you suppose that the unbind should be called from, remove > callback? Here we are talking about the drivers which are builtin, where > remove callbacks are not called from the driver core during > reboot/shutdown, > instead shutdown callbacks are called which needs to be defined in order > to > trigger unbind. So AFAICS there is nothing to be fixed. > Interesting - in drm effectively only drm panels implement .shutdown. So my naive assumption was that .remove was used implicitly by core, as part of the shutdown process. Yet that's not the case, so it seems that many drivers could use some fixes. Then again, that's an existing problem which is irrelevant for msm. -Emil
