Hi Florian,
Am 28.05.20 um 21:21 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> The BCM7211 SoC uses the same pinconf_ops as the ones defined for the
> BCM2711 SoC, match the compatible string and use the correct set of
> options.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> index 06bd2b70af3c..e8ad1824c6b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-bcm2835.c
> @@ -1137,6 +1137,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id bcm2835_pinctrl_match[] = {
> .compatible = "brcm,bcm2711-gpio",
> .data = &bcm2711_plat_data,
> },
> + {
> + .compatible = "brcm,bcm7211-gpio",
> + .data = &bcm2711_pinconf_ops,
this doesn't look safe. Maybe bcm2711_plat_data?
Looks like the original patch series based on a older version. Please
double check this still applies since the introduction of 58 GPIO
support for BCM2711.
Regards
Stefan
> + },
> {}
> };
>
