On 24.05.2014 00:44, Tarek Dakhran wrote: > Hi Tomazs, > > On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Tarek, >> >> With v2 of the series I mentioned in review of previous version [1], >> this patch can be skipped. >> >> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31258.html >> >> Best regards, >> Tomasz >> >> On 23.05.2014 12:35, Tarek Dakhran wrote: > [snip] >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >>> index 739bdc8..971baf0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c >>> @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static int exynos_set_cpu_boot_addr(int cpu, unsigned long boot_addr) >>> >>> boot_reg = sysram_ns_base_addr + 0x1c; >>> >>> - if (!soc_is_exynos4212()) >>> + if (!soc_is_exynos4212() && !soc_is_exynos5410()) >>> boot_reg += 4*cpu; >>> >>> __raw_writel(boot_addr, boot_reg); >>> > > I need to define SoC type to set correct bootreg in firmware, > otherwise only one cpu can be booted. > So, this stuff is needed. The patch I referred to in my previous reply changes this condition from !soc_is_exynos4212() to soc_is_exynos4412(), which makes the 4*cpu offset being added only in case of Exynos4412 (and so not being added for Exynos5410). What else is needed? Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
