Hi Jaako, > The changes required to this patch at XIIC driver from suggested DT > changes are pretty minor. Basically only checking a different > property, reversing logic and some naming changes. I can make these > changes already for the driver if this solution is what will be > chosen, or would you prefer to still think about this? I think we can go forward this way. Although I didn't find an example, I am quite sure YAML format can have exclusive properties. If not, it should be added ;) I'll try again to get some information from people more experienced with YAML. But we don't depend on it. > Regarding the device tree changes: I am not very familiar with the > needed documentation changes, YAML bindings or what needs to be done > for new bindings in general. Would you prefer to still consider them > and/or get these subsystem level bindings done by someone more > familiar with them? Another option would be for me to try find time to > do the suggested bindings changes anyway, but it will likely require > some effort from me to familiarize with device tree bindings changes > and schedule the time for it. No need to. Luckily, the I2C main bindings file is still text, so it is easy to modify. I will send a patch out in a few minutes, so you can base your driver code on that. Converting to YAML is a completely different step, not related to your patch here. (Sidenote: I am looking for volunteers to do that) I think this covers it? Happy hacking, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
