On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:06:55PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
<snip>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..789c77af501f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,1678 @@
<snip>
I've searched netdev and I cannot find any reports from others but this
function introduces a clang warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1296:6: warning: variable 'new_dma_addr' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (!new_skb) {
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1321:23: note: uninitialized use occurs here
desc_data.dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1296:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
if (!new_skb) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1285:6: warning: variable 'new_dma_addr' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if ((desc_data.flags & MTK_STAR_DESC_BIT_RX_CRCE) ||
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1321:23: note: uninitialized use occurs here
desc_data.dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1285:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
if ((desc_data.flags & MTK_STAR_DESC_BIT_RX_CRCE) ||
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1285:6: warning: variable 'new_dma_addr' is used uninitialized whenever '||' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if ((desc_data.flags & MTK_STAR_DESC_BIT_RX_CRCE) ||
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1321:23: note: uninitialized use occurs here
desc_data.dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1285:6: note: remove the '||' if its condition is always false
if ((desc_data.flags & MTK_STAR_DESC_BIT_RX_CRCE) ||
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_star_emac.c:1274:25: note: initialize the variable 'new_dma_addr' to silence this warning
dma_addr_t new_dma_addr;
^
= 0
3 warnings generated.
> +static int mtk_star_receive_packet(struct mtk_star_priv *priv)
> +{
> + struct mtk_star_ring *ring = &priv->rx_ring;
> + struct device *dev = mtk_star_get_dev(priv);
> + struct mtk_star_ring_desc_data desc_data;
> + struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
> + struct sk_buff *curr_skb, *new_skb;
> + dma_addr_t new_dma_addr;
Uninitialized here
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> + ret = mtk_star_ring_pop_tail(ring, &desc_data);
> + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> + if (ret)
> + return -1;
> +
> + curr_skb = desc_data.skb;
> +
> + if ((desc_data.flags & MTK_STAR_DESC_BIT_RX_CRCE) ||
> + (desc_data.flags & MTK_STAR_DESC_BIT_RX_OSIZE)) {
> + /* Error packet -> drop and reuse skb. */
> + new_skb = curr_skb;
> + goto push_new_skb;
this goto
> + }
> +
> + /* Prepare new skb before receiving the current one. Reuse the current
> + * skb if we fail at any point.
> + */
> + new_skb = mtk_star_alloc_skb(ndev);
> + if (!new_skb) {
> + ndev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> + new_skb = curr_skb;
> + goto push_new_skb;
and this goto
> + }
> +
> + new_dma_addr = mtk_star_dma_map_rx(priv, new_skb);
> + if (dma_mapping_error(dev, new_dma_addr)) {
> + ndev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> + dev_kfree_skb(new_skb);
> + new_skb = curr_skb;
> + netdev_err(ndev, "DMA mapping error of RX descriptor\n");
> + goto push_new_skb;
> + }
> +
> + /* We can't fail anymore at this point: it's safe to unmap the skb. */
> + mtk_star_dma_unmap_rx(priv, &desc_data);
> +
> + skb_put(desc_data.skb, desc_data.len);
> + desc_data.skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> + desc_data.skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(desc_data.skb, ndev);
> + desc_data.skb->dev = ndev;
> + netif_receive_skb(desc_data.skb);
> +
> +push_new_skb:
> + desc_data.dma_addr = new_dma_addr;
assign it uninitialized here.
> + desc_data.len = skb_tailroom(new_skb);
> + desc_data.skb = new_skb;
> +
> + spin_lock(&priv->lock);
> + mtk_star_ring_push_head_rx(ring, &desc_data);
> + spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
I don't know if there should be a new label that excludes that
assignment for those particular gotos or if new_dma_addr should
be initialized to something at the top. Please take a look at
addressing this when you get a chance.
Cheers,
Nathan
