Hi Jerry,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:47:32PM +0800, Jerry-ch Chen wrote:
> From: Jerry-ch Chen <jerry-ch.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This patch adds the driver of Face Detection (FD) unit in
> Mediatek camera system, providing face detection function.
>
> The mtk-isp directory will contain drivers for multiple IP
> blocks found in Mediatek ISP system. It will include ISP Pass 1
> driver (CAM), sensor interface driver, DIP driver and face
> detection driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerry-ch Chen <jerry-ch.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/media/platform/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/Kconfig | 19 +
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/Makefile | 5 +
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h | 149 ++
> drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd_40.c | 1279 +++++++++++++++++
> include/uapi/linux/v4l2-controls.h | 4 +
> include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h | 3 +
> 8 files changed, 1463 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd_40.c
>
Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline. Really sorry for
the much delayed review.
[snip]
> +config VIDEO_MEDIATEK_FD
> + tristate "Mediatek face detection processing function"
> + depends on VIDEO_V4L2
> + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK
> + select VIDEOBUF2_DMA_CONTIG
> + select VIDEOBUF2_CORE
> + select VIDEOBUF2_V4L2
> + select VIDEOBUF2_MEMOPS
> + select MEDIA_CONTROLLER
> + select MTK_SCP
> +
> + default n
> + help
> + Support the Face Detection (FD) feature in the Mediatek
> + mt8183 Soc.
MT8183?
> +
> + FD driver is a V4L2 memory-to-memory device driver which
> + provides hardware accelerated face detection function,
> + it can detect different sizes of faces in a raw image.
A YUV image I guess?
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d85bdcb70d6d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/mtk-isp/fd/mtk_fd.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +//
> +// Copyright (c) 2018 MediaTek Inc.
> +
> +#ifndef __MTK_FD_HW_H__
> +#define __MTK_FD_HW_H__
> +
> +#include <linux/completion.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-ctrls.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-device.h>
> +#include <media/videobuf2-v4l2.h>
> +
> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MIN_WIDTH 26U
> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MIN_HEIGHT 26U
> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MAX_WIDTH 640U
> +#define MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MAX_HEIGHT 480U
> +
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_VYUY 2
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_UYVY 3
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YVYU 4
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YUYV 5
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YVU_2P 6
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YUV_2P 7
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_FMT_UNKNOWN 8
What is an unknown format?
> +
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_INIT 0
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_INIT_ACK 1
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_ENQUEUE 2
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_ENQ_ACK 3
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_EXIT 4
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_EXIT_ACK 5
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_RESET 6
> +#define MTK_FD_IPI_CMD_RESET_ACK 7
> +
> +#define MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_HW_ENABLE 0x4
> +#define MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_EN 0x15c
> +#define MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_VAL 0x168
> +#define MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_RESULT 0x178
> +
> +#define MTK_FD_SET_HW_ENABLE 0x111
> +#define MTK_FD_RS_BUF_SIZE 2289664
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_WORK_BUF_SIZE 0x100000
How about using the SZ_1M?
> +#define MTK_FD_MAX_SPEEDUP 7
> +#define MTK_FD_MAX_RESULT_NUM 1026
Perhaps NUM_RESULTS?
> +
> +/* Max scale size counts */
> +#define MTK_FD_SCALE_ARR_NUM 15
Perhaps NUM_SCALE_SIZES?
> +
> +#define MTK_FD_HW_TIMEOUT 1000
What's the unit?
> +
> +enum face_angle {
> + MTK_FD_FACE_FRONT,
> + MTK_FD_FACE_RIGHT_50,
> + MTK_FD_FACE_LEFT_50,
> + MTK_FD_FACE_RIGHT_90,
> + MTK_FD_FACE_LEFT_90,
> + MTK_FD_FACE_ANGLE_NUM,
> +};
This enum seems to define values for the V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_DETECT_POSE
control. Considering that this is an enumeration and the values are
actually integers (-90, -50, 0, 50, 90), perhaps this should be an
INTEGER_MENU control instead?
> +
> +struct fd_buffer {
> + __u32 scp_addr; /* used by SCP */
> + __u32 dma_addr; /* used by DMA HW */
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct fd_face_result {
> + char data[16];
> +};
> +
> +struct fd_user_output {
> + struct fd_face_result results[MTK_FD_MAX_RESULT_NUM];
> + __u16 number;
Is this perhaps the number of results? If so, would num_results be a better
name?
> +};
Since this struct is the meta buffer format, it is a part of the userspace
interface and should be defined in a header under include/uapi/linux/.
> +
> +struct user_param {
> + u8 fd_speedup;
> + u8 fd_extra_model;
> + u8 scale_img_num;
> + u8 src_img_fmt;
> + __u16 scale_img_width[MTK_FD_SCALE_ARR_NUM];
> + __u16 scale_img_height[MTK_FD_SCALE_ARR_NUM];
> + __u16 face_directions[MTK_FD_FACE_ANGLE_NUM];
Is this a user-facing definition or an interface between the kernel driver
and firmware? If the latter, the __ types shouldn't be used.
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct fd_init_param {
> + struct fd_buffer fd_manager;
> + __u32 rs_dma_addr;
Ditto.
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct fd_enq_param {
> + __u64 output_vaddr;
Ditto.
> + struct fd_buffer src_img[2];
> + struct fd_buffer user_result;
> + struct user_param user_param;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct fd_ack_param {
> + __u32 ret_code;
> + __u32 ret_msg;
Ditto.
> +} __packed;
[snip]
> +/* */
Was there supposed to be a comment here? :)
> +static int mtk_fd_hw_alloc_rs_dma_addr(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = fd->dev;
> + void *va;
> + dma_addr_t dma_handle;
> +
> + va = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, MTK_FD_RS_BUF_SIZE, &dma_handle,
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!va) {
> + dev_err(dev, "dma_alloc null va\n");
No need to print errors for memory allocation failures, because one will be
printed automatically.
[snip]
> +static int mtk_fd_hw_connect(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = rproc_boot(fd->rproc_handle);
> +
nit: Unnecessary blank line.
[snip]
> +static int mtk_fd_vb2_queue_setup(struct vb2_queue *vq,
> + unsigned int *num_buffers,
> + unsigned int *num_planes,
> + unsigned int sizes[],
> + struct device *alloc_devs[])
> +{
> + struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
> + unsigned int size[2];
> + unsigned int plane;
> +
> + switch (vq->type) {
> + case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_META_CAPTURE:
> + size[0] = ctx->dst_fmt.buffersize;
> + break;
> + case V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE:
> + size[0] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[0].sizeimage;
> + if (*num_planes == 2)
> + size[1] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[1].sizeimage;
> + break;
> + }
Is this code above needed? The code below sets sizes[] and it uses a for loop,
without opencoded assignment for the second plane.
> +
> + if (*num_planes > 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (*num_planes == 0) {
> + if (vq->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_META_CAPTURE) {
> + sizes[0] = ctx->dst_fmt.buffersize;
> + *num_planes = 1;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + *num_planes = ctx->src_fmt.num_planes;
> + for (plane = 0; plane < *num_planes; plane++)
> + sizes[plane] = ctx->src_fmt.plane_fmt[plane].sizeimage;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + for (plane = 0; plane < *num_planes; plane++) {
> + if (sizes[plane] < size[plane])
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
[snip]
> +static int mtk_fd_enum_fmt_out_mp(struct file *file, void *fh,
> + struct v4l2_fmtdesc *f)
> +{
> + if (f->index >= NUM_FORMATS)
Please use ARRAY_SIZE().
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + f->pixelformat = mtk_fd_img_fmts[f->index].pixelformat;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_fd_fill_pixfmt_mp(struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *dfmt,
> + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *sfmt)
> +{
> + dfmt->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> + dfmt->colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_BT2020;
> + dfmt->num_planes = sfmt->num_planes;
> + dfmt->ycbcr_enc = V4L2_YCBCR_ENC_DEFAULT;
> + dfmt->quantization = V4L2_QUANTIZATION_DEFAULT;
> + dfmt->xfer_func =
> + V4L2_MAP_XFER_FUNC_DEFAULT(dfmt->colorspace);
> +
> + /* Keep user setting as possible */
> + dfmt->width = clamp(dfmt->width,
> + MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MIN_WIDTH,
> + MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MAX_WIDTH);
> + dfmt->height = clamp(dfmt->height,
> + MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MIN_HEIGHT,
> + MTK_FD_OUTPUT_MAX_HEIGHT);
> +
> + if (sfmt->num_planes == 2) {
> + /* NV16M and NV61M has 1 byte per pixel */
> + dfmt->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = dfmt->width;
> + dfmt->plane_fmt[1].bytesperline = dfmt->width;
> + } else {
> + /* 2 bytes per pixel */
> + dfmt->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline = dfmt->width * 2;
> + }
> +
> + dfmt->plane_fmt[0].sizeimage =
> + dfmt->height * dfmt->plane_fmt[0].bytesperline;
Could some of the code above be replaced with v4l2_fill_pixfmt_mp()?
> +}
> +
> +static const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *mtk_fd_find_fmt(u32 format)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *dev_fmt;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NUM_FORMATS; i++) {
Please use ARRAY_SIZE rather than a custom macro.
> + dev_fmt = &mtk_fd_img_fmts[i];
> + if (dev_fmt->pixelformat == format)
> + return dev_fmt;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_fd_try_fmt_out_mp(struct file *file,
> + void *fh,
> + struct v4l2_format *f)
> +{
> + struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *pix_mp = &f->fmt.pix_mp;
> + const struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *fmt;
> +
> + fmt = mtk_fd_find_fmt(pix_mp->pixelformat);
> + if (!fmt)
> + fmt = &mtk_fd_img_fmts[0]; /* Get default img fmt */
nit: Please move the comment to a separate line and add braces.
> +
> + mtk_fd_fill_pixfmt_mp(pix_mp, fmt);
> + return 0;
> +}
[snip]
> +static unsigned int get_fd_img_fmt(unsigned int fourcc)
> +{
> + switch (fourcc) {
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_VYUY:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_VYUY;
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_YUYV:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YUYV;
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_YVYU:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YVYU;
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_UYVY:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_UYVY;
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV16M:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YUV_2P;
> + case V4L2_PIX_FMT_NV61M:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_YVU_2P;
> + default:
> + return MTK_FD_HW_FMT_UNKNOWN;
If we want to be paranoid, we can just add a WARN here and return 0.
Shouldn't be a need to define an unknown format.
[snip]
> +static void mtk_fd_fill_user_param(struct user_param *user_param,
> + struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl)
> +{
> + struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl;
> + int i;
> +
> + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_SCALE_DOWN_IMG_WIDTH);
> + if (ctrl)
> + for (i = 0; i < ctrl->elems; i++)
> + user_param->scale_img_width[i] = ctrl->p_new.p_u16[i];
> + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_SCALE_DOWN_IMG_HEIGHT);
> + if (ctrl)
> + for (i = 0; i < ctrl->elems; i++)
> + user_param->scale_img_height[i] = ctrl->p_new.p_u16[i];
> + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_SCALE_IMG_NUM);
> + if (ctrl)
> + user_param->scale_img_num = ctrl->val;
> +
nit: Either separate the code dealing with all controls from each other, or
none.
> + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_DETECT_POSE);
> + if (ctrl)
> + for (i = 0; i < ctrl->elems; i++)
> + user_param->face_directions[i] = ctrl->p_new.p_u16[i];
> + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_DETECT_SPEED);
> + if (ctrl)
> + user_param->fd_speedup = ctrl->val;
> + ctrl = v4l2_ctrl_find(hdl, V4L2_CID_MTK_FD_DETECTION_MODEL);
> + if (ctrl)
> + user_param->fd_extra_model = ctrl->val;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_fd_device_run(void *priv)
> +{
> + struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = priv;
> + struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev;
> + struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *src_buf, *dst_buf;
> + struct fd_enq_param fd_param;
> + void *plane_vaddr;
> +
> + src_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_src_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> + dst_buf = v4l2_m2m_next_dst_buf(ctx->fh.m2m_ctx);
> +
> + fd_param.src_img[0].dma_addr =
> + vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(&src_buf->vb2_buf, 0);
> + fd_param.user_result.dma_addr =
> + vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(&dst_buf->vb2_buf, 0);
> + plane_vaddr = vb2_plane_vaddr(&dst_buf->vb2_buf, 0);
> + fd_param.output_vaddr = (u64)(unsigned long)plane_vaddr;
Why is the vaddr needed here? Specfically, it could pose a security problem
if CPU virtual addresses are exchanged with firmware.
> + fd_param.user_param.src_img_fmt =
> + get_fd_img_fmt(ctx->src_fmt.pixelformat);
> + if (ctx->src_fmt.num_planes == 2)
> + fd_param.src_img[1].dma_addr =
> + vb2_dma_contig_plane_dma_addr(&src_buf->vb2_buf, 1);
nit: Could this be moved above, to be just below src_img[0] initialization,
for readability reasons?
> + mtk_fd_fill_user_param(&fd_param.user_param, &ctx->hdl);
> +
> + /* Complete request controls if any */
> + v4l2_ctrl_request_complete(src_buf->vb2_buf.req_obj.req, &ctx->hdl);
> +
> + fd->output = plane_vaddr;
> + mtk_fd_hw_job_exec(fd, &fd_param);
> +}
> +
> +static struct v4l2_m2m_ops fd_m2m_ops = {
> + .device_run = mtk_fd_device_run,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct media_device_ops fd_m2m_media_ops = {
> + .req_validate = vb2_request_validate,
> + .req_queue = v4l2_m2m_request_queue,
> +};
> +
> +static int mtk_fd_video_device_register(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd)
> +{
> + struct video_device *vfd = &fd->vfd;
> + struct v4l2_m2m_dev *m2m_dev = fd->m2m_dev;
> + struct device *dev = fd->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + vfd->fops = &fd_video_fops;
> + vfd->release = video_device_release;
> + vfd->lock = &fd->vfd_lock;
> + vfd->v4l2_dev = &fd->v4l2_dev;
> + vfd->vfl_dir = VFL_DIR_M2M;
> + vfd->device_caps = V4L2_CAP_STREAMING | V4L2_CAP_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE |
> + V4L2_CAP_META_CAPTURE;
> + vfd->ioctl_ops = &mtk_fd_v4l2_video_out_ioctl_ops;
> +
> + strscpy(vfd->name, dev_driver_string(dev), sizeof(vfd->name));
> +
> + video_set_drvdata(vfd, fd);
> +
> + ret = video_register_device(vfd, VFL_TYPE_GRABBER, 0);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register video device\n");
> + goto err_free_dev;
> + }
> +
> + ret = v4l2_m2m_register_media_controller(m2m_dev, vfd,
> + MEDIA_ENT_F_PROC_VIDEO_STATISTICS);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init mem2mem media controller\n");
> + goto err_unreg_video;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unreg_video:
> + video_unregister_device(vfd);
> +err_free_dev:
> + video_device_release(vfd);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_fd_dev_v4l2_init(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd)
> +{
> + struct media_device *mdev = &fd->mdev;
> + struct device *dev = fd->dev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = v4l2_device_register(dev, &fd->v4l2_dev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register v4l2 device\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + fd->m2m_dev = v4l2_m2m_init(&fd_m2m_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(fd->m2m_dev)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to init mem2mem device\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(fd->m2m_dev);
> + goto err_unreg_v4l2_dev;
> + }
> +
> + mdev->dev = dev;
> + strscpy(mdev->model, dev_driver_string(dev), sizeof(mdev->model));
> + snprintf(mdev->bus_info, sizeof(mdev->bus_info),
> + "platform:%s", dev_name(dev));
> + media_device_init(mdev);
> + mdev->ops = &fd_m2m_media_ops;
> + fd->v4l2_dev.mdev = mdev;
> +
> + ret = mtk_fd_video_device_register(fd);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register video device\n");
> + goto err_cleanup_mdev;
> + }
> +
> + ret = media_device_register(mdev);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register mem2mem media device\n");
> + goto err_unreg_vdev;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unreg_vdev:
> + v4l2_m2m_unregister_media_controller(fd->m2m_dev);
> + video_unregister_device(&fd->vfd);
> + video_device_release(&fd->vfd);
This is inconsistent with the registration, which registers all of these in
a function. Perhaps it would be worth to move this cleanup to a
mtk_fd_video_device_unregister() function?
> +err_cleanup_mdev:
> + media_device_cleanup(mdev);
> + v4l2_m2m_release(fd->m2m_dev);
> +err_unreg_v4l2_dev:
> + v4l2_device_unregister(&fd->v4l2_dev);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_fd_dev_v4l2_release(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd)
> +{
> + v4l2_m2m_unregister_media_controller(fd->m2m_dev);
> + video_unregister_device(&fd->vfd);
> + video_device_release(&fd->vfd);
> + media_device_cleanup(&fd->mdev);
> + v4l2_m2m_release(fd->m2m_dev);
> + v4l2_device_unregister(&fd->v4l2_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t mtk_fd_irq(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = (struct mtk_fd_dev *)data;
> +
> + /* must read this register otherwise HW will keep sending irq */
> + readl(fd->fd_base + MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_VAL);
> + fd->output->number = readl(fd->fd_base + MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_RESULT);
> + dev_dbg(fd->dev, "mtk_fd_face_num:%d\n", fd->output->number);
> +
> + mtk_fd_hw_done(fd, VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static int mtk_fd_hw_get_scp_mem(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = fd->dev;
> + dma_addr_t addr;
> + void *ptr;
> + u32 ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Allocate coherent reserved memory for SCP firmware usage.
> + * The size of SCP composer's memory is fixed to 0x100000
> + * for the requirement of firmware.
> + */
> + ptr = dma_alloc_coherent(&fd->scp_pdev->dev,
> + MTK_FD_HW_WORK_BUF_SIZE, &addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + fd->scp_mem.scp_addr = addr;
> + fd->scp_mem_virt_addr = ptr;
> + dev_info(dev, "scp addr:%pad va:%pK\n", &addr, ptr);
These addresses are nothing a user should be concerned about, so please
don't use the _info level here. If you think this is an important debugging
information, please make it dev_dbg(). Otherwise, please just remove.
> +
> + /*
> + * This reserved memory is also be used by FD HW.
> + * Need to get iova address for FD DMA.
> + */
> + addr = dma_map_resource(dev, addr, MTK_FD_HW_WORK_BUF_SIZE,
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE, DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC);
Note that the second argument to dma_map_resource() is phys_addr_t, but the
code above passes a DMA address. This works only by luck, because both
physical and SCP DMA address space have the same addresses. To be fully
correct, dma_map_single() needs to be used, with the kernel virtual address
passed to it, but currently it doesn't handle the memory from a reserved
pool. Thus, we can only keep the hack as is, but please add a comment
explaining it, e.g.
/*
* FIXME: Assume SCP DMA and physical addresses are the same until
* dma_map_single() is fixed to handle reserved memory allocations.
*/
> + if (dma_mapping_error(dev, addr)) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to map scp iova\n");
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto fail_free_mem;
> + }
> + fd->scp_mem.dma_addr = addr;
> + dev_info(dev, "scp iova addr:%pad\n", &addr);
Ditto.
Best regards,
Tomasz
