On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:43 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:34:07PM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > > index ac8e37cd716a..6cd916860b5f 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/device.h > > +++ b/include/linux/device.h > > @@ -493,6 +493,8 @@ struct dev_links_info { > > * @bus_dma_limit: Limit of an upstream bridge or bus which imposes a smaller > > * DMA limit than the device itself supports. > > * @dma_pfn_offset: offset of DMA memory range relatively of RAM > > + * @dma_map: Like dma_pfn_offset but used when there are multiple > > + * pfn offsets for multiple dma-ranges. > > * @dma_parms: A low level driver may set these to teach IOMMU code about > > * segment limitations. > > * @dma_pools: Dma pools (if dma'ble device). > > @@ -578,7 +580,12 @@ struct device { > > allocations such descriptors. */ > > u64 bus_dma_limit; /* upstream dma constraint */ > > unsigned long dma_pfn_offset; > > - > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_PFN_OFFSET_MAP > > + const void *dma_offset_map; /* Like dma_pfn_offset, but for > > + * the unlikely case of multiple > > + * offsets. If non-null, dma_pfn_offset > > + * will be 0. */ > > +#endif > > struct device_dma_parameters *dma_parms; > > > > struct list_head dma_pools; /* dma pools (if dma'ble) */ > > I'll defer to Christoph here, but I thought we were trying to get rid of > stuff like this from struct device, not add new things to it for dma Hi Greg, I wasn't aware of this policy. I put it in 'struct device' because just like the existing dma_pfn_offset; it seemed to be the only way to pull this off. I'll certainly follow any ideas on alternative strategies from Christoph et al. > apis. And why is it a void *? Just wanted to minimize the number of lines I've added to device.h, no other reason. Thanks, Jim > > thanks, > > greg k-h