On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:42 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 15-05-20, 11:46, Jassi Brar wrote: > > As I asked you yesterday over the call, it may help if you could share > > some numbers to back up the doomsday scenario. > > Yes, I have already asked Sudeep to get some numbers for this. He will > get back to us. > Thanks, current bottleneck numbers and the patch/changes to improve that, would help. > > > - With the current approach it isn't possible to assign different bits > > > (or doorbell numbers) to clients from DT and the only way of doing > > > that without adding new bindings is by extending #mbox-cells to accept > > > a value of 2 as done in this patch. > > > > > I am afraid you are confused. You can use bit/doorbell-6 by passing > > 0x40 to mhu as the data to send. > > That's how the code will do it, right I agree. What I was asking was > the way this information is passed from DT. > That is a client/protocol property and has nothing to do with the controller dt node. cheers!
