On 18-05-20, 11:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > That said if you really only want it to return 0 on success, you may as well > add a ret = 0; statement (with a comment explaining why it is needed) after > the last break in the loop. That can be done as well, but will be a bit less efficient as the loop will execute once for each policy, and so the statement will run multiple times. Though it isn't going to add any significant latency in the code. -- viresh
