On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 11:39:11AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On 12-05-20, 15:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 02:49:46PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:08:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:35:31AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 12:01:38AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:05:28PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 02:12:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:53:00PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote: ... > > I leave it to Rob and Vinod. > > It won't break our case, so, feel free with your approach. > > I agree the DT is about describing the hardware and looks like value of > 1 is not allowed. If allowed it should be added.. It's allowed at *run time*, it's illegal in *pre-silicon stage* when synthesizing the IP. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko