Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +
> +struct pch_msi_data {
> + spinlock_t msi_map_lock;
> + phys_addr_t doorbell;
> + u32 irq_first; /* The vector number that MSIs starts */
> + u32 num_irqs; /* The number of vectors for MSIs */
> + unsigned long *msi_map;
> +};
> +
> +static void pch_msi_mask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pci_msi_mask_irq(d);
> + irq_chip_mask_parent(d);
> +}
> +
> +static void pch_msi_unmask_msi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pci_msi_unmask_irq(d);
> + irq_chip_unmask_parent(d);
The ordering of mask and unmask is assymetric. That does not make sense.
> +static struct msi_domain_info pch_msi_domain_info = {
> + .flags = MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS |
> + MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI | MSI_FLAG_PCI_MSIX,
> + .chip = &pch_msi_irq_chip,
Please maintain tabular layout.
Thanks,
tglx
