From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 08:04:39 +0200 > I will if you insist but would you mind sharing some details on why it > was removed? To me it still makes more sense than storing the pointer > to a structure in *that* structure. Flexibility in implementation of where the private data is located and how it is allocated. And yes, I do insist.
