On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 10:07:18PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:32:34PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > The Tegra EMC scaling support code is not a clock provider, but merely a > > clock consumer, and thus does not need to include > > <linux/clk-provider.h>. > > > > However, drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-table.c relies on > > tegra210-emc.h to include <linux/of.h> through <linux/clk-provider.h>. > > Hence the first patch makes <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> self-contained > > first. > > > > Thanks for your comments! > > > > Geert Uytterhoeven (2): > > of: Make <linux/of_reserved_mem.h> self-contained > > memory: tegra: Drop <linux/clk-provider.h> > > > > drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc-core.c | 1 - > > drivers/memory/tegra/tegra210-emc.h | 1 - > > include/linux/of_reserved_mem.h | 1 + > > 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Ah... I should've read the cover letter first. Looks like I need to take > that first patch through the Tegra tree as well to avoid introducing the > build error in the second patch. > > Rob, do you mind if I pick up patch 1 of this into the same OF branch > that I already carry the memory-region-names patches on? No, it's fine. Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
