Hi Ricardo. On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 04:59:11PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote: > Hi Rob, > > What's your opinion on this? I'm not Rob, but anyway. > > Some context: It's about bindings that define signed integer properties > with range checks that go below and above zero. The schema checker fails > because, apparently, it interprets every cell value as an uint32, which > makes the range check fail for negative numbers. > > > > > b) Redefine this property to be closer to the datasheet description > > > > (ie. unsigned integers from 0 to 7) and adapt the driver accordingly. > > > > This would also let us define its range properly using minimum and > > > > maximum properties for it. > > > > > > > > I think (b) is the right thing to do but I want to know your > > > > opinion. Besides, I don't have this hardware at hand and if I updated > > > > the driver I wouldn't be able to test it. Based on the discussions option b) above seems like the best compromise. Sam
