On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 03:30:40PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:42:24PM +0300, Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > We also could add CPU_MIPS64_R5 config support here, but I don't think > > it's necessary at the moment seeing there is no any real chip ever > > produced with that arch. Right? > > how much is missing ? Looks like not too much, so it might be worth > to add it at least for symmetry to the other ISAs... Yeah, just a few more alteration to add together with new CPU_MIPS64_R5 config. I'll do this in v3. -Sergey > > Thomas. > > -- > Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a > good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
