On Tue, 20 May 2014 19:55:45 -0700, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/13/2014 7:58 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > > Make of_find_node_by_path() handle aliases as prefixes. To make this > > > work the name search is refactored to search by path component instead > > > of by full string. This should be a more efficient search, and it makes > > > it possible to start a search at a subnode of a tree. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > [grant.likely: Rework to not require allocating at runtime] > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/of/base.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Was this patch created against a tree that has modifications to device tree > > locking? > I get a hang due to deadlock when I apply it. Patch to verify the > cause is below. Ummm... I may have forgotten to enable CONFIG_LOCKDEP when testing. Try the following fix, and can you please pass me that brown paper bag. g. commit 35e9c5ae6c3d0b5eb91579f397d8e1ecb95ee711 Author: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu May 22 01:04:17 2014 +0900 dt: Create unlocked version of for_each_child_of_node() When iterating over nodes, sometimes it needs to be done when the DT lock is already held. This patch makes an unlocked version of the for_each_child_of_node() macro. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c index 8900d378c07e..c05a143b6a70 100644 --- a/drivers/of/base.c +++ b/drivers/of/base.c @@ -695,6 +695,22 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_next_parent); +#define __for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \ + for (child = __of_get_next_child(parent, NULL); child != NULL; \ + child = __of_get_next_child(parent, child)) +static struct device_node *__of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node, + struct device_node *prev) +{ + struct device_node *next; + + next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child; + for (; next; next = next->sibling) + if (of_node_get(next)) + break; + of_node_put(prev); + return next; +} + /** * of_get_next_child - Iterate a node childs * @node: parent node @@ -710,11 +726,7 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node, unsigned long flags; raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags); - next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child; - for (; next; next = next->sibling) - if (of_node_get(next)) - break; - of_node_put(prev); + next = __of_get_next_child(node, prev); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags); return next; } @@ -780,7 +792,7 @@ static struct device_node *__of_find_node_by_path(struct device_node *parent, if (!len) return parent; - for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) { + __for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) { const char *name = strrchr(child->full_name, '/'); if (WARN(!name, "malformed device_node %s\n", child->full_name)) continue; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html