Hi Roger, On 21 May 02:20 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > > For DT boot: > - The GPMC controller node should have a chip select (CS) node for each used > chip select. The CS node must have a child device node for each device > attached to that chip select. Properties for that child are GPMC agnostic. > > i.e. > gpmc { > cs0 { > nand0 { > } > }; > > cs1 { > nor0 { > } > } > ... > }; > While I agree that the GPMC driver is a bit messy, I'm not sure it's possible to go through such a complete devicetree binding re-design (breaking backwards compatibility) now that the binding is already in production. AFAIK, TI's SDK 7.0 is released, with a v3.8.x kernel which uses this GPMC binding. And then you have the ISEE board too, using this binding. Also, what's the problem with the current devicetree binding (not that I'm fan of it)? -- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html