On Tuesday 13 May 2014 17:59:21 Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 02:06:23AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > What's the status of this ? The gpio regulator driver now defaults to > > voltage regulator when the regulator-type property is not set. Should the > > DT bindings document the property as optional (I can submit a patch for > > that), or do you consider that the gpio regulator driver should support > > voltage regulators only when used with DT, and just keep the > > regulator-type property support in the driver for backward compatibility > > ? > > I don't really care either way, I did write a patch for the bindings but > there was some language lawyering over it and I never cared enough to > get round to updating it. Could you please point me to the patch ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
