Nikolay, On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:24:39AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > [Adding devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:28:21AM +0100, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > Document the addition of 2 new, implementation-agnostic compatible > > strings. This allows for more flexibility such that new implementation > > can either state whether they are an extension of an existing implementation, > > a brand new implementation or just that they conform to a standard revision > > of the GIC spec. > > From my POV it makes sense to have these to make it possible to write > DTs with new GIC variants which are implementations of the standard > rather than extensions of existing implementations. > > However, DTs using these should also state exactly what variant they > are, and those strings should be documented (even if not supported > directly by the driver). It would be nice to have that mentioned in the > commit message. Please tweak the commit message as Mark suggested and resend, including me in the Cc. I'll queue it up for tglx. > Otherwise: > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > Also, please include Mark's Acks. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
