Hi Tomi, On mié 06-05-2020 11:01:07, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Doesn't all this just point to a bug or missing feature in dt_binding_check? > That's not a reason to change the ABI. I agree and I'd vote for "missing feature", but seeing that there aren't any other examples of this use case in the whole kernel dts collection (at least I couldn't find any) I thought that maybe it's us who are going against the norm here. Maybe Rob can shed some light about this? Cheers, Ricardo