Hi Vinod, As you've seen, I've submitted a v3 of this patch with all your comments addressed - except one - macros vs. numbers. Would that version be acceptable or would you like a v4? Also see a couple of comments below. On Wed, 21 May 2014, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:15:28AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Vinod, > > > > Thanks for a review. > > > > On Wed, 7 May 2014, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 02:03:44PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > This patch adds a driver for NBPF DMAC IP cores from Renesas, designed for > > > > the AMBA AXI bus. > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nbpfaxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nbpfaxi.txt > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 0000000..d5e2522 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nbpfaxi.txt [snip] > > > Pls split the DT bindings to seprate patch. This part needs ack from DT folks > > > > I thaught it would be preferable for both to go into the tree > > simultaneously, i.e. as a single patch, they can review and ack this patch > > too, but ok, can do, np. > That helps in getting that part acked by DT folks and track independent of DMA > changes. Ofocurse both will be applied togther or DT first :) Done. As for applying after the DT part is in - can it also not be helped by the fact, that I'm not adding any own bindings, only using standard dmaengine ones? > > > > +static size_t nbpf_xfer_size(struct nbpf_device *nbpf, > > > > + enum dma_slave_buswidth width, u32 burst) > > > > +{ > > > > + size_t size; > > > > + > > > > + if (!burst) > > > > + burst = 1; > > > > + > > > > + switch (width) { > > > > + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_8_BYTES: > > > > + size = 8 * burst; > > > > + break; > > > > + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES: > > > > + size = 4 * burst; > > > > + break; > > > > + case DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_2_BYTES: > > > > + size = 2 * burst; > > > why not > > > size = width * burst; > > > for all these three cases? > > > > because width is an enum, that "accidentally" coincides with the > > respective numerical value. I find this confusing - if it's an enum, you > > shouldn't use it in calculations. If it's a numerical value, just use it > > explicitly, but mixing both... > ah, i dont agree with the reasoning. We have fair examples of using enums for > these calculations to covert dmaengine values to driver type. This is juts a > conversion and saves code space and simplfies the routine... I'm fine with using the width for calculations, but then DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_*_BYTES should be killed! Looking through grep results, personally I would find .src_info.data_width = 1, in drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c at least as understandable as the present .src_info.data_width = DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_1_BYTE, or even more. And if someone doesn't find this clear enough, you can always add comments. Then all calculations are jastified, including those, using the BIT() macro. [snip] > > > > +static enum dma_status nbpf_tx_status(struct dma_chan *dchan, > > > > + dma_cookie_t cookie, struct dma_tx_state *state) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct nbpf_channel *chan = nbpf_to_chan(dchan); > > > > + enum dma_status status = dma_cookie_status(dchan, cookie, state); > > > > + dma_cookie_t running = chan->running ? chan->running->async_tx.cookie : -EINVAL; > > > > + > > > > + if (chan->paused) > > > > + status = DMA_PAUSED; > > > > + > > > > + /* Note: we cannot return residues for old cookies */ > > > ??? If cookie is completed then reside is 0. So how is this comment valid? > > > > For completed ones it's 0, sure. > so what does comment mean here about "old" cookies? Think about the amba-pl011.c serial driver. The way it handles Rx is it submits a 4k buffer, but then waits for an Rx timeout IRQ and pauses, reads out status / residue and terminates that transfer. So, Rx transfers are routinely incomplete. Their residue was != 0, but ones they are terminated you cannot retrieve that residue any longer. Thanks Guennadi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html