On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I guess this is just to evaluate how big the lynch mob will be. Anyway: > Triggered by this discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/15/46, I > looked a little into what it would take to migrate everybody to Hz > frequency resolutions to avoid all the conversions between cpufreq, CCF, > OPPs, etc. > Turns out, OPPs are already stored in Hz resolution in the kernel, but the DT > bindings use kHz resolution to specify them in DT. So, code-wise there > is just a removal of a multiplication in the OPP parser (see below), but > then there are the DT bindings... Yep :( unfortunately, so :( > > As plan B, I was thinking to add the property 'operating-points-hz'... > > Any better ideas? property operating-points-hz as a bool perhaps -> that modifies the description and maintains legacy dtb support sounds OK to me if DT folks and Rafael are ok with it as well. Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
