Hi Christophe,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 15 Apr
2020 17:57:31 +0200:
> This patch renames functions and local variables to be ready to use
> stm32_fmc2 structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxx>
> ---
> -static int stm32_fmc2_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
> - const struct nand_data_interface *conf)
> +static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_setup_interface(struct nand_chip *chip, int chipnr,
> + const struct nand_data_interface *cf)
I suppose you s/conf/cf/ because of the 80 chars boundary. In this case
I don't mind crossing it, I don't think it is better to rename the
conf parameter for this reason.
> {
> const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdrt;
>
> - sdrt = nand_get_sdr_timings(conf);
> + sdrt = nand_get_sdr_timings(cf);
> if (IS_ERR(sdrt))
> return PTR_ERR(sdrt);
>
> if (chipnr == NAND_DATA_IFACE_CHECK_ONLY)
> return 0;
>
> - stm32_fmc2_calc_timings(chip, sdrt);
> - stm32_fmc2_timings_init(chip);
> + stm32_fmc2_nfc_calc_timings(chip, sdrt);
> + stm32_fmc2_nfc_timings_init(chip);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
[...]
>
> -static struct platform_driver stm32_fmc2_driver = {
> - .probe = stm32_fmc2_probe,
> - .remove = stm32_fmc2_remove,
> +static struct platform_driver stm32_fmc2_nfc_driver = {
> + .probe = stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe,
> + .remove = stm32_fmc2_nfc_remove,
> .driver = {
> - .name = "stm32_fmc2_nand",
> - .of_match_table = stm32_fmc2_match,
> - .pm = &stm32_fmc2_pm_ops,
> + .name = "stm32_fmc2_nfc",
> + .of_match_table = stm32_fmc2_nfc_match,
> + .pm = &stm32_fmc2_nfc_pm_ops,
> },
> };
> -module_platform_driver(stm32_fmc2_driver);
> +module_platform_driver(stm32_fmc2_nfc_driver);
>
> -MODULE_ALIAS("platform:stm32_fmc2_nand");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:stm32_fmc2_nfc");
> MODULE_AUTHOR("Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxx>");
> -MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics STM32 FMC2 nand driver");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics STM32 FMC2 nfc driver");
I would prefer: s/nfc/NFC/ here please.
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
With these two nits,
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Miquèl
