Hi Christophe, Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxx> wrote on Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:57:30 +0200: > This patch removes the constant FMC2_TIMEOUT_US. > FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS is set to 5 seconds and this constant is used > each time that we need to wait (except when the timeout value > is set by the framework) > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c | 11 +++++------ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c > index ab53314..f159c39 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c > @@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ > /* Max ECC buffer length */ > #define FMC2_MAX_ECC_BUF_LEN (FMC2_BCHDSRS_LEN * FMC2_MAX_SG) > > -#define FMC2_TIMEOUT_US 1000 > -#define FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS 1000 > +#define FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS 5000 > > /* Timings */ > #define FMC2_THIZ 1 > @@ -525,9 +524,9 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_ham_calculate(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *data, > u32 sr, heccr; > int ret; > > - ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(fmc2->io_base + FMC2_SR, > - sr, sr & FMC2_SR_NWRF, 10, > - FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS); > + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(fmc2->io_base + FMC2_SR, > + sr, sr & FMC2_SR_NWRF, 1, > + 1000 * FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS); Is the _atomic suffix needed here? If yes it would deserve a separate patch with Fixes/Stable tags. > if (ret) { > dev_err(fmc2->dev, "ham timeout\n"); > return ret; > @@ -1315,7 +1314,7 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_waitrdy(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned long timeout_ms) > /* Check if there is no pending requests to the NAND flash */ > if (readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(fmc2->io_base + FMC2_SR, sr, > sr & FMC2_SR_NWRF, 1, > - FMC2_TIMEOUT_US)) > + 1000 * FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS)) > dev_warn(fmc2->dev, "Waitrdy timeout\n"); > > /* Wait tWB before R/B# signal is low */ You change the timeouts from 1ms to 5s. Maybe 5s is a little bit too much IMHO but we don't really care as this is a timeout. However 1ms is tight. If you are changing this value because it triggers error (eg. when the machine is loaded), then it is a fix and should appear like it. Thanks, Miquèl