On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:23:47PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Bit# 33222222 22221111 11111100 00000000 > 10987654 32109876 54321098 76543210 > phys.hi cell: npt000ss bbbbbbbb dddddfff rrrrrrrr > phys.mid cell: hhhhhhhh hhhhhhhh hhhhhhhh hhhhhhhh > phys.lo cell: llllllll llllllll llllllll llllllll > > where: > n is 0 if the address is relocatable, 1 otherwise > p is 1 if the addressable region is "prefetchable", 0 otherwise > t is 1 if the address is aliased (for non-relocatable I/O), > below 1 MB (for Memory), or below 64 KB (for relocatable I/O). > ss is the space code, denoting the address space > bbbbbbbb is the 8-bit Bus Number > ddddd is the 5-bit Device Number > fff is the 3-bit Function Number > rrrrrrrr is the 8-bit Register Number > hh...hh is a 32-bit unsigned number > ll...ll is a 32-bit unsigned number > > We can ignore n, p, t and r here, and use the same format for a DMA > address, then define an empty "dma-ranges" property. That would > imply that using b/d/f is sufficient to identify each master at the > iommu. Any device outside of the PCI host but connected to the same > iommu can use the same notation to list the logical b/d/f that gets > sent to the IOMMU in bus master transactions. > > Do you think this is sufficient for the ARM SMMU, or do we need > something beyond that? I think it can define the common-cases for the existing implementations, yes. I anticipate Stream-IDs becoming > 16-bit in the near future though, so we'd need extra bits if we're describing other devices coming into the SMMU. Note that we already have a binding for the current SMMU driver, so I'm not really in a position to shift over to a new binding until the next version of the SMMU architecture comes along... Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
