Hi Grant,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Why has the overlay system been designed for plugging and unpluging whole
>> overlays?
>> That means the kernel has to remember the full stack, causing issues with
>> e.g. kexec.
>
> Mostly so that drivers don't see any difference in the livetree data
> structure. It also means that userspace sees a single representation of
> the hardware at any given time.
Sorry, I don't follow the argument about the "single representation of the
hardware".
>> Why not allowing the addition of removal of subtrees of the full device
>> tree?
>
> Overlays is more than just a subtree. A single overlay can make
> manipulations of multiple subtrees that should be handled as logically
> atomic.
Sure, it's more complicated due to the atomicity of multiple changes.
>> This is similar to other hotpluggable subsystems (which are not necessarily
>> DT-based), like PCI Express. That way the kernel can pass a
>> DT-representation of the actual current device tree to a kexec'ed kernel.
>
> I'm not following you argument. Hardware hotplug systems like PCIe don't
> manipulate the firmware data. The kernel detects the new device and
> populates the Linux device model directly. Firmware provided data (ACPI
> or FDT) isn't involved.
I mean the kernel doesn't remember the exact order in a stack, to reverse
operations. E.g. I can add hotplug a PCIe bridge with multiple devices
behind it, and unplug a single device later. It's still one subtree, though.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
