Am Donnerstag, 16. April 2020, 15:55:19 CEST schrieb Paul Kocialkowski:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu 16 Apr 20, 15:44, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > On 4/16/20 3:24 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu 16 Apr 20, 15:02, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > >> Hi Paul,
> > >>
> > >> The conversion of rockchip-rga.txt to rockchip-rga.yaml by myself just
> > >> has been approved by robh.
> > >
> > > Huh, I looked around for ongoing related work but missed it.
> > > I'll definitely rebase on top of your series and use the yaml description
> > > instead. Thanks!
> > >
> > >> Maybe place dts patches at the end of a patch serie.
> > >> Could you include a &rga patch if your device is supported in mainline,
> > >> so we can test with:
> > >> make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check
> > >> DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-rga.yaml
> > >
> > > I tested with the PX30 EVB so I can surely add a node there if that turns
> > > out necessary (see below).
> > >
> > >> Johan
> > >>
> > >> On 4/16/20 1:50 PM, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > >>> The PX30 features a RGA block: add the necessary node to support it.
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> ---
> > >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> > >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> > >>> index 75908c587511..4bfbee9d4123 100644
> > >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> > >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30.dtsi
> > >>> @@ -1104,6 +1104,17 @@ vopl_mmu: iommu@ff470f00 {
> > >>> status = "disabled";
> > >>> };
> > >>>
> > >>> + rga: rga@ff480000 {
> > >>> + compatible = "rockchip,px30-rga";
> > >>> + reg = <0x0 0xff480000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > >>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 76 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> > >>> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RGA>, <&cru HCLK_RGA>, <&cru SCLK_RGA_CORE>;
> > >>> + clock-names = "aclk", "hclk", "sclk";
> > >>> + resets = <&cru SRST_RGA>, <&cru SRST_RGA_A>, <&cru SRST_RGA_H>;
> > >>> + reset-names = "core", "axi", "ahb";
> > >>> + power-domains = <&power PX30_PD_VO>;
> > >>
> > >> status = "disabled";
> > >
> > > As of 5.6, the rk3399 has the node enabled by default. Did that change?
> >
> > 'status' disappeared during review for rk3399 between v2 and v3, but
> > doesn't mention the reason. If someone can give more info here?
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1500101920-24039-5-git-send-email-jacob-chen@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1501470460-12014-5-git-send-email-jacob-chen@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > >
> > > Since it's a standalone block that has no I/O dependency, I don't really see
> > > the point of disabling it by default.
> >
> > Vop, hdmi and other video devices are also disabled.
> > Follow the rest I think...
>
> Well, these blocks do have related I/O ports so it makes sense not to enable
> them by default because of pinmux, or because there might be no connector
> populated/routed.
>
> For a memory to memory internal block, I don't see any reason why.
> It's definitely not board-specific and having to add these nodes for every board
> that has them is kind of a pain and might be overlooked. This will easily result
> in the feature not being available for end users without having to change the
> dt.
>
> Also, the vpu node is always enabled on rockchip (and sunxi) platforms.
> I think these are better examples to follow.
just to add my me too ... what Paul, Ezequiel and Robin said - so no status
for soc internal components without any board-specifics
Heiko
