On 16.05.2014 07:07, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Abhilash, >> >> On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs- >>>>> pmu.h >>>>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>>>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ >>>>> >>>>> #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD >>>>> >>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2000) >>>> >>>> This can be put in order of address. >>> OK, will fix. >>>> >>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr))) >>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \ >>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4) >> >> My patches posted quite a while ago [1] to fix DT CPU topology already >> add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in >> hotplug.c and platsmp.c. >> >> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573 >> >> So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of >> patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped. > > Patch 2 of your series does not apply on kgene's for-next or > linux-next. Are you planning on re-sending this ? OK, it seems like Kukjin has already applied your v6 series, so let's drop my series for now. I'll remove patch 1 from my series and rebase it on top of your v6. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
