Hi Andy,
On Samstag, 4. April 2020 11:58:31 CEST Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:49 PM Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Add a driver for the SGMICRO SGM3140 Buck/Boost Charge Pump LED driver.
> >
> > This device is controlled by two GPIO pins, one for enabling and the
> > second one for switching between torch and flash mode.
>
> ...
>
> > +config LEDS_SGM3140
> > + tristate "LED support for the SGM3140"
> > + depends on LEDS_CLASS_FLASH
> > + depends on V4L2_FLASH_LED_CLASS || !V4L2_FLASH_LED_CLASS
> >
> > + depends on OF
>
> depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST ?
> But hold on...
>
> ...
>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> Perhaps switch this to property.h and replace OF with more generic
> device property / fwnode API?
>
I didn't find clear documentation on this, the functions in drivers/base/
property.c can be used instead of the of_* (device tree) functions?
As far as I can tell, the device_property_* functions are supposed to be used
for simple "give me a property for this 'struct device*'" while the fwnode_*
functions are used as generic equivalent of the of_* functions?
So in this case I can replace
struct device_node *child_node;
child_node = of_get_next_available_child(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL);
with
struct fwnode_handle *child_node;
child_node = fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(pdev->dev.fwnode, NULL);
and then instead of
ret = of_property_read_u32(child_node, "flash-max-timeout-us",
&priv->max_timeout);
use
ret = fwnode_property_read_u32(child_node, "flash-max-timeout-us",
&priv->max_timeout);
and finally instead of
init_data.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(child_node);
I can probably directly do
init_data.fwnode = child_node;
Does that sound correct?
> ...
>
> > +struct sgm3140 {
> > + bool enabled;
> > + struct gpio_desc *flash_gpio;
> > + struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
> > + struct regulator *vin_regulator;
> > +
> > + /* current timeout in us */
> > + u32 timeout;
> > + /* maximum timeout in us */
> > + u32 max_timeout;
> > +
> >
> > + struct led_classdev_flash fled_cdev;
>
> I guess it might be slightly better to make it first member of the
> struct (I didn't check but the rationale is to put more often used
> members at the beginning to utilize cachelines).
>
> > + struct v4l2_flash *v4l2_flash;
> > +
> > + struct timer_list powerdown_timer;
> > +};
>
> ...
>
> > +static struct sgm3140 *flcdev_to_sgm3140(struct led_classdev_flash
> > *flcdev) +{
> > + return container_of(flcdev, struct sgm3140, fled_cdev);
> > +}
>
> ...and this becomes a no-op AFAICS (doesn't mean you need to remove it).
>
> ...
>
> > + struct device_node *child_node;
> >
> > + child_node = of_get_next_available_child(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL);
> >
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(child_node, "flash-max-timeout-us",
> > + &priv->max_timeout);
> >
> > + init_data.fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(child_node);
> >
> > + of_node_put(child_node);
>
> Device property / fwnode API?
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Regards
Luca
