Hi Liviu,
Issue may not be only with SR-IOV resources.
I am not an expert with Linux PCI core. But i am trying to understand
how even for a non SR-IOV capable device's resource, gets a parent
associated with it.
When a PCI device driver calls pci_enable_device() which inturn calls
'arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c' pcibios_enable_device() which uses Linux PCI core
API 'pci_enable_resources'. This API checks 'res->parent' for all
valid resources
before enabling them, otherwise it fails.
if (!r->parent) {
dev_err(&dev->dev, "device not available "
"(can't reserve %pR)\n", r);
return -EINVAL;
}
Can you please let me know where this hierarchy is being set for
'pcibios_enable_resources' to work.
I could only find request_resource() API which sets the parent and
pci_claim_resource() uses this.
Thanks,
Sunil.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sunil,
>
> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:33:04AM +0100, Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
>> Hi Liviu,
>>
>> I am using your ARM64 PCIe patches to write a PCIe host controller
>> driver for our SOC. I am facing an issue with SR-IOV capable device.
>>
>> Consider an PCI Express endpoint connected to a PCI Express
>> Root Port. The PCI Express endpoint provides PCI-SIG SR-IOV
>> capabilities with a single physical function and a large number
>> of virtual functions. The Root Port contains a pci-pci bridge in
>> between it and the SR-IOV device.
>>
>> When the SR-IOV capable device's driver tries to enable sriov
>> (pci_enable_sriov()) it fails to create/add PCI device for each
>> virtual function reporting "not enough MMIO resources for SR-IOV".
>>
>> In sriov_enable() (drivers/pci/iov.c)
>>
>> 296 for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>> 297 bars |= (1 << (i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES));
>> 298 res = dev->resource + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i;
>> 299 if (res->parent)
>> 300 nres++;
>> 301 }
>> 302 if (nres != iov->nres) {
>> 303 dev_err(&dev->dev, "not enough MMIO resources for
>> SR-IOV\n");
>> 304 return -ENOMEM;
>> 305 }
>>
>> Here its checking if physical function's IOV resource has a parent or not.
>> Which is pci-pci bridge in this case. Otherwise it doesn't consider
>> that resource.
>>
>> Added below api to your patch.
>> This will try to claim a resource while creating a PCI device which
>> inturn sets 'res->parent'.
>>
>> Let me know if this is okay.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> index 9f29c9a..fbfb48f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c
>> @@ -125,6 +125,21 @@ resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void
>> *data, const struct resource *res,
>> return res->start;
>> }
>>
>> +int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int i, type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < PCI_NUM_RESOURCES; i++) {
>> + res = &pdev->resource[i];
>> + if (res->parent || !(res->flags & type_mask))
>> + continue;
>> + pci_claim_resource(pdev, i);
>> + }
>> +
>>
>
> I would like not to have to add your patch in this file as I am trying to
> remove it entirely. I don't have an SR-IOV capable device in my setup so
> I am not able to debug your problem, but could you have a go and try to
> figure out why the SR-IOV resources do not get a parent associated with
> when they get created?
>
> Many thanks,
> Liviu
>
>
> --
> ====================
> | I would like to |
> | fix the world, |
> | but they're not |
> | giving me the |
> \ source code! /
> ---------------
> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
